Workflow v1 / 30 completed workflows

Cedar Landing

Inspect the source packet, compare each system’s work, and read the exact findings behind the score.

The five original source files

Lev Agent

All 39 headline source and financial checks passed.

All 39 headline financial/source checks pass. The workbook recalculates correctly but has three formula errors in explanation cells and inaccurate map addresses. The memo reverses the downside cash outcome and has a table overlap.

Material claims to inspect

Final answer downside table; PDF pp.4–5 — The combined downside requires cash in because the loan is below the $4.5M payoff.

Source-supported finding: 5,338,641.20 − 4,500,000 − 53,386.412 − 65,000 = +720,254.788 cash to borrower.

The narrative reverses the transaction cash-flow sign despite correct loan sizing.

All review findings (3)
  • README lists G32/G34/G37 label cells rather than adjacent H numeric outputs; evaluator located actual outputs and retained both mappings.
  • Three explanation cells are stored as formulas and error after recalculation; financial outputs and sensitivities themselves pass.
  • Final answer cites the insurer confirmation year as 2025, whereas the plan and PDF memo use 2026. Insurance-evidence check is uniformly excluded.
Every artifact acceptance check (17/20)
Work productCheckOutcomeEvidence
Memo1PassActual delivered PDF opens and rendered text/tables are readable.
artifacts PDF; all rendered pages reviewed
Memo2PassCedar Landing, August 31, 2026 and internal refinance purpose are stated.
PDF opening title and property discussion
Memo3PassBase sources/uses show loan 6,407,490, payoff 4,500,000, origination 64,075, closing 65,000 and cash out 1,778,415.
PDF sources and uses
Memo4PassHistorical NOI 320,000 / NCF 305,600 remain separate from UW NOI 647,395 / NCF 631,795.
PDF historical and underwritten tables
Memo5PassDSCR binds at 6,407,490, with 1.30x sizing coverage and 9.86% debt yield; year-one IO debt service uses 6.25% contract rate.
PDF financing and sizing tables
Memo6PassOccupancy, subject-lease rent/expiry/deposit and conditional renewal are discussed against the packet.
PDF property and lease section
Memo7FailThe downside risk narrative incorrectly says the stressed loan falls below the existing payoff and requires cash in.
PDF p.4 and p.5: cash-in under combined downside. Its own stressed loan is $5,338,641; payoff is $4,500,000.
Memo8PassSupplied underwriting scenario and lender assumptions are explicitly separated from historical actuals; no appraisal or credit commitment claimed.
PDF assumptions and scope
Memo9PassSource list identifies all five input files with locations for the financial and lease tables.
PDF source-reference section
Memo10FailThe renewal-option row overruns the value column into the source column; this table requires layout cleanup.
Rendered PDF p.3, Tenant and lease discussion: Renewal option row.
Workbook1PassXLSX opens
Workbook2PassInputs, units, as-of date and source references are identifiable in the delivered workbook.
Workbook input/instruction sheets and source notes
Workbook3PassHistorical and underwritten statements are separate and reconcile to their independently checked totals.
T12 and underwriting sheets; historical NOI 320,000 / NCF 305,600; UW NOI 647,395.20 / NCF 631,795.20
Workbook4Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":647395.2,"expected":647395.2,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":631795.2,"expected":631795.2,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":6407489.51099929,"expected":6407489.510999293,"passed":true}]
Workbook5Pass{"uw_noi_before_reserves":true,"uw_ncf":true,"maximum_loan":true,"capitalization_value":true,"dscr_limit":true}
Workbook6Pass[{"field":"capitalization_value","actual":10358323.2,"expected":10358323.2,"passed":true},{"field":"ltv_limit","actual":6214993.92,"expected":6214993.919999999,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":6214993.92,"expected":6214993.919999999,"passed":true}]
Workbook7Pass[{"field":"dscr_limit","actual":5792169.90098188,"expected":5792169.900981799,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5792169.90098188,"expected":5792169.900981799,"passed":true}]
Workbook8Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":597925.44,"expected":597925.44,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":582325.44,"expected":582325.44,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5905781.09613376,"expected":5905781.096133807,"passed":true}]
Workbook9Fail{"formula_errors":["Assumptions!E10: #VALUE!","Field IDs!D33: #VALUE!","Field IDs!D34: #N/A"],"external_links_or_macros":[]}
Workbook10PassThe main underwriting sheet has readable labels, period columns and unclipped financial outputs.
Rendered underwriting sheet; instruction/input and loan-sizing cells inspected

Inference: $2.167. PostHog trace estimate using OpenRouter model rates; two charged generation events; duplicate run-summary event excluded

Read the analysis, checks and execution record

GPT-5 agent

Fields outside tolerance: occupied_count, occupied_area_sf, occupancy_count_pct, occupancy_area_pct, rent_roll_monthly_base, effective_monthly_base.

Loan math and the changing-input workbook tests pass. An extra occupied apartment causes six source-fact errors that carry into the memo. The workbook omits source references.

All review findings (2)
  • The PDF has a trailing footer-only page and unsupported hyphen glyphs in some dates. Core table content remains readable, so these are polish findings rather than an additional acceptance-check failure.
  • A single extra occupied unit propagates into six source-fact errors. Source citations do not validate those wrong numbers.
Every artifact acceptance check (18/20)
Work productCheckOutcomeEvidence
Memo1PassActual delivered PDF opens and rendered text/tables are readable.
artifacts PDF; all rendered pages reviewed
Memo2PassCedar Landing, August 31, 2026 and internal refinance purpose are stated.
PDF opening title and property discussion
Memo3PassBase sources/uses show loan 6,407,490, payoff 4,500,000, origination 64,075, closing 65,000 and cash out 1,778,415.
PDF sources and uses
Memo4PassHistorical NOI 320,000 / NCF 305,600 remain separate from UW NOI 647,395 / NCF 631,795.
PDF historical and underwritten tables
Memo5PassDSCR binds at 6,407,490, with 1.30x sizing coverage and 9.86% debt yield; year-one IO debt service uses 6.25% contract rate.
PDF financing and sizing tables
Memo6FailThe memo reports 34 occupied units, 27,800 occupied SF and $58,050 monthly rent; the source has 33, 26,700 and $56,025.
PDF p.1 Property, rent roll and leases; p.2 source table.
Memo7PassSensitivity and missing diligence are disclosed as risks and unresolved evidence.
PDF downside and limitations sections
Memo8PassSupplied underwriting scenario and lender assumptions are explicitly separated from historical actuals; no appraisal or credit commitment claimed.
PDF assumptions and scope
Memo9PassSource list identifies all five input files with locations for the financial and lease tables.
PDF source-reference section
Memo10PassSection hierarchy and tables can be read at normal page scale.
Rendered full PDF
Workbook1PassXLSX opens
Workbook2FailInputs and as-of date are present, but the delivered workbook contains no source file/page or clause references.
Inputs and remaining workbook cell text: no PDF/XLSX source names or source-location notes.
Workbook3PassHistorical and underwritten statements are separate and reconcile to their independently checked totals.
T12 and underwriting sheets; historical NOI 320,000 / NCF 305,600; UW NOI 647,395.20 / NCF 631,795.20
Workbook4Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":647395.2,"expected":647395.2,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":631795.2,"expected":631795.2,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":6407489.51099931,"expected":6407489.510999293,"passed":true}]
Workbook5Pass{"uw_noi_before_reserves":true,"uw_ncf":true,"maximum_loan":true,"capitalization_value":true,"dscr_limit":true}
Workbook6Pass[{"field":"capitalization_value","actual":10358323.2,"expected":10358323.2,"passed":true},{"field":"ltv_limit","actual":6214993.92,"expected":6214993.919999999,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":6214993.92,"expected":6214993.919999999,"passed":true}]
Workbook7Pass[{"field":"dscr_limit","actual":5792169.90098186,"expected":5792169.900981799,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5792169.90098186,"expected":5792169.900981799,"passed":true}]
Workbook8Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":597925.44,"expected":597925.44,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":582325.44,"expected":582325.44,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5905781.09613377,"expected":5905781.096133807,"passed":true}]
Workbook9Pass{"formula_errors":[],"external_links_or_macros":[]}
Workbook10PassThe main underwriting sheet has readable labels, period columns and unclipped financial outputs.
Rendered underwriting sheet; instruction/input and loan-sizing cells inspected

Inference: $0.312. Gateway usage.cost; all attempts included; absent usage remains unknown

Read the analysis, checks and execution record

Opus 5 agent

All 39 headline source and financial checks passed.

All 39 headline financial/source checks and workbook acceptance checks pass. The memo distinguishes conditional lease-up sizing and correctly keeps downside cash positive; it contains a minor source-date error.

All review findings (3)
  • The narrative describes the plan-reported insurance confirmation as not independently verified. That is a reasonable reading of the ambiguous evidence criterion, uniformly excluded from headline scoring.
  • The PDF insurance discussion gives August 25, 2025 once, while the plan says 2026. The correct source location and premium are otherwise identified; source-date transcription is retained as a minor finding.
  • Eight pages are readable but longer than the other delivered memos.
Every artifact acceptance check (20/20)
Work productCheckOutcomeEvidence
Memo1PassActual delivered PDF opens and rendered text/tables are readable.
artifacts PDF; all rendered pages reviewed
Memo2PassCedar Landing, August 31, 2026 and internal refinance purpose are stated.
PDF opening title and property discussion
Memo3PassBase sources/uses show loan 6,407,490, payoff 4,500,000, origination 64,075, closing 65,000 and cash out 1,778,415.
PDF sources and uses
Memo4PassHistorical NOI 320,000 / NCF 305,600 remain separate from UW NOI 647,395 / NCF 631,795.
PDF historical and underwritten tables
Memo5PassDSCR binds at 6,407,490, with 1.30x sizing coverage and 9.86% debt yield; year-one IO debt service uses 6.25% contract rate.
PDF financing and sizing tables
Memo6PassOccupancy, subject-lease rent/expiry/deposit and conditional renewal are discussed against the packet.
PDF property and lease section
Memo7PassSensitivity and missing diligence are disclosed as risks and unresolved evidence.
PDF downside and limitations sections
Memo8PassSupplied underwriting scenario and lender assumptions are explicitly separated from historical actuals; no appraisal or credit commitment claimed.
PDF assumptions and scope
Memo9PassSource list identifies all five input files with locations for the financial and lease tables.
PDF source-reference section
Memo10PassSection hierarchy and tables can be read at normal page scale.
Rendered full PDF
Workbook1PassXLSX opens
Workbook2PassInputs, units, as-of date and source references are identifiable in the delivered workbook.
Workbook input/instruction sheets and source notes
Workbook3PassHistorical and underwritten statements are separate and reconcile to their independently checked totals.
T12 and underwriting sheets; historical NOI 320,000 / NCF 305,600; UW NOI 647,395.20 / NCF 631,795.20
Workbook4Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":647395.2,"expected":647395.2,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":631795.2,"expected":631795.2,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":6407489.51099931,"expected":6407489.510999293,"passed":true}]
Workbook5Pass{"uw_noi_before_reserves":true,"uw_ncf":true,"maximum_loan":true,"capitalization_value":true,"dscr_limit":true}
Workbook6Pass[{"field":"capitalization_value","actual":10358323.2,"expected":10358323.2,"passed":true},{"field":"ltv_limit","actual":6214993.92,"expected":6214993.919999999,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":6214993.92,"expected":6214993.919999999,"passed":true}]
Workbook7Pass[{"field":"dscr_limit","actual":5792169.90098186,"expected":5792169.900981799,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5792169.90098186,"expected":5792169.900981799,"passed":true}]
Workbook8Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":597925.44,"expected":597925.44,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":582325.44,"expected":582325.44,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5905781.09613378,"expected":5905781.096133807,"passed":true}]
Workbook9Pass{"formula_errors":[],"external_links_or_macros":[]}
Workbook10PassThe main underwriting sheet has readable labels, period columns and unclipped financial outputs.
Rendered underwriting sheet; instruction/input and loan-sizing cells inspected

Inference: $3.020. Gateway usage.cost; all attempts included; absent usage remains unknown

Read the analysis, checks and execution record

Inspect every reported value

The same 39 source and financial checks apply to every system. Open a row to see the response citation and review rationale. Direct controls are labeled separately.

Lev Agent

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
48
Expected
48
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7–54
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!C7:C54
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
33
Expected
33
Response evidence
Status = "Occupied" (units 101–133)
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!F7:F54
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
43,200
Expected
43,200
Response evidence
24 × 700 + 24 × 1,100
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!E7:E54
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
26,700
Expected
26,700
Response evidence
24 × 700 + 9 × 1,100
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!E7:F54
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
68.7500
Expected
68.75
Response evidence
33 ÷ 48
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!C7:F54
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
61.8056
Expected
61.805556
Response evidence
26,700 ÷ 43,200
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!E7:F54
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
$56,025
Expected
56,025
Response evidence
24 × $1,575 + 9 × $2,025 (occupied only; vacants have no contractual rent)
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!F7:G54
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
$56,025
Expected
56,025
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf §3 confirms Unit 101 rent = $1,575; no authoritative amendments in packet
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!F7:G54; Lease-File.pdf §3, §6
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
$691,200
Expected
691,200
Response evidence
T12 p.2 annual: 1,036,800 − 302,400 − 64,800 − 8,400 + 30,000
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
$371,200
Expected
371,200
Response evidence
132,000 + 40,800 + 33,600 + 54,000 + 55,200 + 27,600 + 28,000 (T12 p.2, ex-reserves/capex/debt/depreciation)
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
$320,000
Expected
320,000
Response evidence
691,200 − 371,200
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
$14,400
Expected
14,400
Response evidence
T12 p.2 below-NOI line
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
$305,600
Expected
305,600
Response evidence
320,000 − 14,400
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
$1,575
Expected
1,575
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf §3
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §3
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2027-06-30
Expected
2027-06-30
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf §2 (initial term)
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §2
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
$1,200
Expected
1,200
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf §4 (not prepaid rent)
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §4
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf §5 — conditional option; no exercise notice in packet
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §5
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
$1,025,280.00
Expected
1,025,280
Response evidence
1,056,000 × (1 − 7.00%) + 43,200
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
$35,884.80
Expected
35,884.8
Response evidence
MAX(T12 $28,000; 3.50% × UW EGI = $35,884.80) → 3.50% floor binds
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
$377,884.80
Expected
377,884.8
Response evidence
138,000 + 45,600 + 33,600 + (54,000−12,000) + 55,200 + 27,600 + 35,884.80
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
$647,395.20
Expected
647,395.2
Response evidence
1,025,280 − 377,884.80
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
$15,600.00
Expected
15,600
Response evidence
48 units × $325
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
$631,795.20
Expected
631,795.2
Response evidence
647,395.20 − 15,600
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
$11,259,046.96
Expected
11,259,046.956522
Response evidence
647,395.20 ÷ 5.75%
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
6.250%
Expected
0.0625
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
6.500%
Expected
0.065
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.0758481628
Expected
0.075848
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
$6,755,428.17
Expected
6,755,428.173913
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
Calculation supplied
60% × $11,259,046.96
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
$6,407,489.51
Expected
6,407,489.510999
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
Calculation supplied
$631,795.20 ÷ (1.30 × 0.07584816)
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
$7,019,946.67
Expected
7,019,946.666667
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
Calculation supplied
$631,795.20 ÷ 9.00%
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
$6,407,489.51
Expected
6,407,489.510999
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
Calculation supplied
MIN of the three
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
$485,996.31
Expected
485,996.307692
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.300x
Expected
1.3
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
9.860%
Expected
0.098603
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
$400,468.09
Expected
400,468.094437
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
$1,778,414.62
Expected
1,778,414.615889
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
Calculation supplied
Sources and Uses table
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
$597,925.44
Expected
597,925.44
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
$5,338,641.20
Expected
5,338,641.202314
Response evidence
No inline location supplied

GPT-5 agent

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
48
Expected
48
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx C7:C54; Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 unit-based reserves 48 units
Calculation supplied
Count of units on rent roll (C7:C54) = 48
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!C7:C54
occupied_countValue failedCitation failed
Reported
34
Expected
33
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx rows C7:C39 occupied; C40:C54 vacant
Calculation supplied
Occupied units listed 101–134 except 134 occupied then 135–148 vacant; total occupied count = 34
Review
The cited source does not support the reported value; see source observation.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!F7:F54
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
43,200
Expected
43,200
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx E7:E54 total; 34 units x 700 sf (24, - actually 24 units at 700 sf and 24 units at 1100 sf) = (24*700)+(24*1100)=16800+26400=43200
Calculation supplied
Sum of unit areas 24x700 + 24x1100 = 43,200 sf
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!E7:E54
occupied_area_sfValue failedCitation failed
Reported
27,800
Expected
26,700
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx occupied areas: 101–133 occupied (700 sf x 23 = 16,100) and 125–133 1100 sf x 9 = 9,900 and 134 occupied 1100; check sum.
Calculation supplied
Occupied area sum from rent roll rows C7:C39 and C31:C39 = 34 units; 25 units at 700 sf? Reconcile: 101–124 = 24 units @700, all occupied; 125–134 = 10 units @1100, with 125–133 occupied (9) and 134 occupied (1); total occupied area = 24*700 + 10*1100 = 16,800 + 11,000 = 27,800 sf
Review
The cited source does not support the reported value; see source observation.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!E7:F54
occupancy_count_pctValue failedCitation failed
Reported
70.833333
Expected
68.75
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx counts as above
Calculation supplied
34 / 48 * 100 = 70.8333333333
Review
The cited source does not support the reported value; see source observation.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!C7:F54
occupancy_area_pctValue failedCitation failed
Reported
64.351852
Expected
61.805556
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx areas as above
Calculation supplied
27,800 / 43,200 * 100 = 64.35185185
Review
The cited source does not support the reported value; see source observation.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!E7:F54
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue failedCitation failed
Reported
58,050
Expected
56,025
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx B9 summary created in workbook; source G7:G39 sum
Calculation supplied
Sum of occupied monthly base rents: 24 units @ $1,575 + 10 units @ $2,025 = 24*1575 + 10*2025 = $37,800 + $20,250 = $58,050
Review
The cited source does not support the reported value; see source observation.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!F7:G54
effective_monthly_baseValue failedCitation failed
Reported
58,050
Expected
56,025
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 confirms Unit 101 rent $1,575; no amendments changing any printed rents were provided
Calculation supplied
No authoritative amendments provided; effective equals printed roll total $58,050
Review
The cited source does not support the reported value; see source observation.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!F7:G54; Lease-File.pdf §3, §6
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
691,200
Expected
691,200
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 annual totals
Calculation supplied
EGI = 1,036,800 - 302,400 - 64,800 - 8,400 + 30,000 = 691,200
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
371,200
Expected
371,200
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 annual totals lines taxes through management fee
Calculation supplied
Sum of opex before reserves: 132,000 + 40,800 + 33,600 + 54,000 + 55,200 + 27,600 + 28,000 = 371,200
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
320,000
Expected
320,000
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 EGI and opex totals
Calculation supplied
NOI before reserves = EGI 691,200 - opex 371,200 = 320,000
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
14,400
Expected
14,400
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Replacement reserves annual
Calculation supplied
Given annual total $14,400
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
305,600
Expected
305,600
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 NOI before reserves and reserves
Calculation supplied
NCF = 320,000 - 14,400 = 305,600
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,575
Expected
1,575
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 Sec. 3; Rent-Roll.xlsx G7
Calculation supplied
Per executed lease extract and rent roll
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §3
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2027-06-30
Expected
2027-06-30
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 Sec. 2; Rent-Roll.xlsx I7
Calculation supplied
Per executed lease extract; no extension evidenced
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §2
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,200
Expected
1,200
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 Sec. 4
Calculation supplied
Per executed lease extract
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §4
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 Sec. 5 notes no exercise notice in packet
Calculation supplied
No written exercise evidenced
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §5
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
1,025,280
Expected
1,025,280
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 underwriting plan
Calculation supplied
UW EGI = GPR $1,056,000 - 7% loss $73,920 + other income $43,200 = $1,025,280
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
35,884.8
Expected
35,884.8
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 management fee rule; T12 mgmt $28,000; EGI from above
Calculation supplied
Max(28,000; 3.5% x 1,025,280) = $35,884.80
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
377,884.8
Expected
377,884.8
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 expense normalizations; insurance renewal $45,600
Calculation supplied
Taxes 138,000 + Insurance 45,600 + Utilities 33,600 + R&M (54,000 - 12,000) 42,000 + Payroll 55,200 + Admin 27,600 + Mgmt 35,884.8 = 377,884.8
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
647,395.2
Expected
647,395.2
Response evidence
Derived from UW EGI and UW opex
Calculation supplied
NOI before reserves = 1,025,280 - 377,884.8 = 647,395.2
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
15,600
Expected
15,600
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 reserves $325 per unit; 48 units
Calculation supplied
$325 x 48 = $15,600
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
631,795.2
Expected
631,795.2
Response evidence
Derived from UW NOI and reserves
Calculation supplied
NCF = 647,395.2 - 15,600 = 631,795.2
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
11,259,046.956522
Expected
11,259,046.956522
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 valuation method 5.75% cap; UW NOI before reserves
Calculation supplied
Value = 647,395.2 / 0.0575 = 11,259,046.96
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0625
Expected
0.0625
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 Contract rate 6.25%
Calculation supplied
Given
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.065
Expected
0.065
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 sizing rate is greater of contract or 6.50% floor
Calculation supplied
Greater of 6.25% and 6.50% = 6.50%
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.075848
Expected
0.075848
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 amortization 30 yrs monthly; our calc uses PMT(0.065/12,360,1)*12
Calculation supplied
12 * PMT(0.065/12, 360, 1) = 0.0758481628 per $1 of loan
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,755,428.173913
Expected
6,755,428.173913
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 60% of value
Calculation supplied
0.60 * 11,259,046.96 = 6,755,428.17
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
6,407,489.510999
Expected
6,407,489.510999
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 DSCR = NCF / annual amortizing debt service at sizing rate, min 1.30x
Calculation supplied
Max loan = 631,795.2 / (1.30 * 0.07584816281915584) = 6,407,489.51
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
7,019,946.666667
Expected
7,019,946.666667
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 Debt yield 9% using NCF after reserves
Calculation supplied
631,795.2 / 0.09 = 7,019,946.67
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
6,407,489.510999
Expected
6,407,489.510999
Response evidence
Minimum of LTV, DSCR, DY limits
Calculation supplied
MIN(6,755,428.17; 6,407,489.51; 7,019,946.67) = 6,407,489.51
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Comparison of constraints above
Calculation supplied
DSCR is smallest limit
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
485,996.307692
Expected
485,996.307692
Response evidence
Annual debt constant and maximum loan
Calculation supplied
0.07584816281915584 * 6,407,489.510999293 = 485,996.31
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.3
Expected
1.3
Response evidence
Definition per term sheet
Calculation supplied
631,795.2 / 485,996.3076923076 = 1.30x
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.098603
Expected
0.098603
Response evidence
Debt yield definition per term sheet
Calculation supplied
631,795.2 / 6,407,489.510999293 = 0.09860261166 (9.8603%)
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
400,468.094437
Expected
400,468.094437
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 contract rate 6.25%, 36 months IO
Calculation supplied
Interest-only year one = 0.0625 * 6,407,489.510999293 = 400,468.09
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
1,778,414.615889
Expected
1,778,414.615889
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 payoff $4.5MM, fixed costs $65k; Lender-Terms 1% origination
Calculation supplied
Loan - payoff - 1% fee - fixed costs = 6,407,489.511 - 4,500,000 - 64,074.895 - 65,000 = 1,778,414.616
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
597,925.44
Expected
597,925.44
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 sensitivity instruction
Calculation supplied
EGI_down = 1,025,280 * 0.95 = 974,016; mgmt = max(28,000, 3.5%*EGI_down=34,090.56); stressed opex before reserves = 138,000 + 45,600 + 33,600 + 42,000 + 55,200 + 27,600 + 34,090.56 = 376,090.56; NOI = 974,016 - 376,090.56 = 597,925.44
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
5,338,641.202314
Expected
5,338,641.202314
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 and Lender-Terms.pdf p.1; apply EGI -5% and sizing rate +100 bps; cap unchanged
Calculation supplied
NCF_stressed = 597,925.44 - 15,600 = 582,325.44; annual debt constant at 7.50% = 0.08390574102633318; DSCR limit = 582,325.44 / (1.30 * 0.08390574102633318) = 5,338,641.20; LTV limit 60% x (597,925.44/0.0575) = 6,239,221.98; Debt yield limit = 582,325.44 / 0.09 = 6,470,282.67; binding stressed proceeds = 5,338,641.20 (DSCR).

Opus 5 agent

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
48
Expected
48
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, worksheet 'Rent Roll', unit rows 7-54 (units 101-148)
Calculation supplied
COUNTA of unit rows 7-54 = 48
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!C7:C54
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
33
Expected
33
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' Status column F, rows 7-39 'Occupied'; rows 40-54 'Vacant'
Calculation supplied
COUNTIF(Status='Occupied') = 33
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!F7:F54
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
43,200
Expected
43,200
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' column E, rows 7-54
Calculation supplied
24 x 700 + 24 x 1,100 = 16,800 + 26,400 = 43,200
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!E7:E54
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
26,700
Expected
26,700
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' rows 7-39 (occupied)
Calculation supplied
24 x 700 + 9 x 1,100 = 16,800 + 9,900 = 26,700
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!E7:F54
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
68.75
Expected
68.75
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' rows 7-54
Calculation supplied
33 / 48 x 100 = 68.75
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!C7:F54
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
61.81
Expected
61.805556
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' rows 7-54, column E
Calculation supplied
26,700 / 43,200 x 100 = 61.8056
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!E7:F54
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
56,025
Expected
56,025
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' column G, rows 7-39; rows 40-54 blank (vacant, note at row 57)
Calculation supplied
24 x 1,575 + 9 x 2,025 = 37,800 + 18,225 = 56,025
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!F7:G54
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
56,025
Expected
56,025
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' column G; Lease-File.pdf p.1 sections 3 and 6 (base rent $1,575/month for 101; a signed amendment would be required to modify a rent schedule; none delivered)
Calculation supplied
No executed amendment delivered for any unit; unit 101 lease rent ($1,575) equals rent roll, so effective = printed = $56,025
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx, Rent Roll!F7:G54; Lease-File.pdf §3, §6
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
691,200
Expected
691,200
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, Annual column (GPR 1,036,800; vacancy -302,400; concessions -64,800; bad debt -8,400; other income 30,000)
Calculation supplied
1,036,800 - 302,400 - 64,800 - 8,400 + 30,000 = 691,200
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
371,200
Expected
371,200
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column expense rows; Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (debt, capex, depreciation are not operating expenses)
Calculation supplied
132,000 + 40,800 + 33,600 + 54,000 + 55,200 + 27,600 + 28,000 = 371,200 (excludes reserves 14,400, capex 184,000, P&I 294,000, depreciation 180,000)
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
320,000
Expected
320,000
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
Calculation supplied
691,200 - 371,200 = 320,000
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
14,400
Expected
14,400
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, 'Replacement reserves (below NOI)' Annual = 14,400
Calculation supplied
Sum of monthly reserves = 14,400 as printed
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
305,600
Expected
305,600
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2; Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (owner may call cash flow after reserves 'property NOI')
Calculation supplied
320,000 - 14,400 = 305,600
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,575
Expected
1,575
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 section 3 ('Base rent is $1,575 per month as of August 31, 2026'); Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' G7 = 1575
Calculation supplied
Executed lease and rent roll agree; no amendment delivered
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §3
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2027-06-30
Expected
2027-06-30
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 section 2 ('The initial term expires 2027-06-30'); Rent-Roll.xlsx I7 = 2027-06-30; Lease-File.pdf section 5 (do not extend on the existence of the option alone)
Calculation supplied
Authoritative executed expiry; renewal option not evidenced as exercised
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §2
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,200
Expected
1,200
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 section 4 ('The security deposit is $1,200 and is not prepaid rent or recurring income')
Calculation supplied
As stated; excluded from income
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §4
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 section 5 ('No exercise notice, landlord acknowledgment or amendment exercising this option is included in the packet') · Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' C59 ('no option exercise notice is included')
Calculation supplied
No exercise evidence delivered; option treated as unexercised and expiry not extended
Review
Provided source locations and the scoped table context support this value; relevant source contents were checked.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf §5
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
1,025,280
Expected
1,025,280
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (GPR $1,056,000; combined revenue loss 7.00%; other income $43,200 added after loss)
Calculation supplied
1,056,000 x (1 - 0.07) = 982,080; + 43,200 = 1,025,280
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
35,884.8
Expected
35,884.8
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (greater of T12 actual and 3.50% of underwritten EGI); T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (T12 management fee 28,000)
Calculation supplied
MAX(28,000, 0.035 x 1,025,280 = 35,884.80) = 35,884.80
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
377,884.8
Expected
377,884.8
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 expense table (taxes 138,000; insurance 45,600 allowance; utilities 33,600 T12; R&M T12 54,000 less 12,000 one-time casualty; payroll 55,200; admin 27,600)
Calculation supplied
138,000 + 45,600 + 33,600 + 42,000 + 55,200 + 27,600 + 35,884.80 = 377,884.80
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
647,395.2
Expected
647,395.2
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2; workbook Underwriting!B18
Calculation supplied
1,025,280 - 377,884.80 = 647,395.20
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
15,600
Expected
15,600
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 ($325.00 per unit per year, deducted after NOI); Rent-Roll.xlsx 48 units
Calculation supplied
325 x 48 = 15,600
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
631,795.2
Expected
631,795.2
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2; workbook Underwriting!B20
Calculation supplied
647,395.20 - 15,600 = 631,795.20
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
11,259,046.96
Expected
11,259,046.956522
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Valuation: underwritten NOI BEFORE reserves / 5.75% cap rate; no appraisal implied)
Calculation supplied
647,395.20 / 0.0575 = 11,259,046.96
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0625
Expected
0.0625
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1, 'Contract rate 6.25% fixed annual contractual rate'
Calculation supplied
As stated
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.065
Expected
0.065
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1, 'Sizing rate: greater of current contractual rate and 6.50% underwriting floor'
Calculation supplied
MAX(6.25%, 6.50%) = 6.50%
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.075848
Expected
0.075848
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (30-year monthly amortization; annual debt service = 12 monthly payments)
Calculation supplied
12 x PMT(0.065/12, 360, 1) = 12 x 0.006320680 = 0.07584816281916 per $1 of principal
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,755,428.17
Expected
6,755,428.173913
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (LTV 60.00% of indicative value)
Calculation supplied
0.60 x 11,259,046.96 = 6,755,428.17
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
6,407,489.51
Expected
6,407,489.510999
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Minimum 1.30x using NCF AFTER reserves / annual amortizing debt service at sizing rate)
Calculation supplied
(631,795.20 / 1.30) / 0.07584816281916 = 485,996.31 / 0.07584816 = 6,407,489.51
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
7,019,946.67
Expected
7,019,946.666667
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Debt yield minimum 9.00%; numerator is underwritten NCF AFTER reserves)
Calculation supplied
631,795.20 / 0.09 = 7,019,946.67
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
6,407,489.51
Expected
6,407,489.510999
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Loan ceiling: lowest of LTV, DSCR and debt-yield constraints; no separate dollar cap); workbook Loan Sizing!B11
Calculation supplied
MIN(6,755,428.17; 6,407,489.51; 7,019,946.67) = 6,407,489.51
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Workbook Loan Sizing!B12; Lender-Terms.pdf p.1
Calculation supplied
DSCR constraint is the lowest of the three
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
485,996.31
Expected
485,996.307692
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (amortizing debt service at sizing rate, 12 monthly payments)
Calculation supplied
6,407,489.51 x 0.07584816281916 = 485,996.31
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.3
Expected
1.3
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1; workbook Loan Sizing!B15
Calculation supplied
631,795.20 / 485,996.31 = 1.300 (DSCR binding, at the minimum)
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.0986
Expected
0.098603
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (numerator is underwritten NCF after reserves); workbook Loan Sizing!B16
Calculation supplied
631,795.20 / 6,407,489.51 = 0.098603
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
400,468.09
Expected
400,468.094437
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (6.25% contract rate; interest-only period 36 months); workbook Loan Sizing!B18
Calculation supplied
Year 1 is inside the 36-month IO period: 6,407,489.51 x 6.25% = 400,468.09 ($33,372.34/month)
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
1,778,414.62
Expected
1,778,414.615889
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (payoff $4,500,000; fixed closing costs $65,000); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (1.00% origination fee on actual initial principal)
Calculation supplied
6,407,489.51 - 4,500,000 - (0.01 x 6,407,489.51 = 64,074.90) - 65,000 = +1,778,414.62 (cash out to borrower)
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
597,925.44
Expected
597,925.44
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 sensitivity instruction (reduce total underwritten EGI by 5%, recompute management minimum, hold other expenses and reserves constant); workbook Sensitivity!C16
Calculation supplied
EGI 1,025,280 x 0.95 = 974,016; management MAX(28,000, 0.035 x 974,016 = 34,090.56) = 34,090.56; other opex 342,000; total opex 376,090.56; NOI = 974,016 - 376,090.56 = 597,925.44
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
5,338,641.2
Expected
5,338,641.202314
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (combined downside: EGI -5% and sizing rate +100 bps, cap rate unchanged); workbook Sensitivity!E26
Calculation supplied
Stress NCF = 597,925.44 - 15,600 = 582,325.44. Value = 597,925.44/0.0575 = 10,398,703.30 -> LTV 6,239,221.98. Constant at 7.50% = 0.08390574103; DSCR limit = (582,325.44/1.30)/0.08390574103 = 5,338,641.20. Debt yield limit = 582,325.44/0.09 = 6,470,282.67. MIN = 5,338,641.20 (DSCR binding)

GPT-5 agent · direct API control

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
48
Expected
48
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | Rows C7:C54 list units 101–148 (48 total)
Calculation supplied
Count of unique Unit/suite entries (101–148) = 48
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
33
Expected
33
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | F7:F40 show 33 units with Status='Occupied' (101–133); 134–148 are 'Vacant'
Calculation supplied
Occupied units = 33
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
43,200
Expected
43,200
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | E7:E54 (areas per unit)
Calculation supplied
24 units × 700 sf + 24 units × 1100 sf = 16,800 sf + 26,400 sf = 43,200 sf
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
26,700
Expected
26,700
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | E7:E39 (occupied units 101–133)
Calculation supplied
24 occupied units × 700 sf + 9 occupied units × 1100 sf = 16,800 sf + 9,900 sf = 26,700 sf
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
68.75
Expected
68.75
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | Occupied count 33; total count 48
Calculation supplied
(33 / 48) × 100 = 68.75%
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
61.81
Expected
61.805556
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | Occupied area 26,700 sf; total area 43,200 sf
Calculation supplied
(26,700 / 43,200) × 100 = 61.8056% ≈ 61.81%
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
56,025
Expected
56,025
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | G7:G39 (occupied units’ Monthly base rent); G40:G54 vacant have no contractual rent
Calculation supplied
24 units × $1,575 + 9 units × $2,025 = $37,800 + $18,225 = $56,025/month
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
56,025
Expected
56,025
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 (Unit 101 base rent $1,575 as of 2026-08-31, no increase before 2027-09-01); Rent-Roll.xlsx G7:G39
Calculation supplied
No lease amendments provided other than Unit 101; effective equals printed rent roll for occupied units; $0 for vacancies. Total = $56,025/month
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
691,200
Expected
691,200
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (Annual totals): GPBR 1,036,800; Vacancy (302,400); Concessions (64,800); Bad debt (8,400); Other income 30,000
Calculation supplied
1,036,800 - 302,400 - 64,800 - 8,400 + 30,000 = 691,200
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
371,200
Expected
371,200
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (Annual): Taxes 132,000; Insurance 40,800; Utilities 33,600; R&M 54,000; Payroll 55,200; Admin 27,600; Mgmt 28,000
Calculation supplied
132,000 + 40,800 + 33,600 + 54,000 + 55,200 + 27,600 + 28,000 = 371,200
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
320,000
Expected
320,000
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
EGI 691,200 - OpEx 371,200 = 320,000
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
14,400
Expected
14,400
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (Replacement reserves annual total)
Calculation supplied
Reported annual replacement reserves = 14,400
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
305,600
Expected
305,600
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
NOI before reserves 320,000 - Reserves 14,400 = 305,600
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,575
Expected
1,575
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 (Premises 101 base rent $1,575 as of 2026-08-31); Rent-Roll.xlsx G7
Calculation supplied
As stated in executed lease; matches rent roll
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2027-06-30
Expected
2027-06-30
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 (Initial term expires 2027-06-30); Rent-Roll.xlsx I7
Calculation supplied
As stated
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,200
Expected
1,200
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 (Security deposit $1,200)
Calculation supplied
As stated
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §5 (No exercise notice or amendment included; do not extend expiry based on option alone)
Calculation supplied
No evidence of exercise provided
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
1,025,280
Expected
1,025,280
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Underwriting plan: GPBR $1,056,000; combined revenue loss 7%; other income $43,200)
Calculation supplied
1,056,000 × (1 - 0.07) + 43,200 = 982,080 + 43,200 = 1,025,280
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
35,884.8
Expected
35,884.8
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Management fee: greater of T12 actual $28,000 and 3.5% of underwritten EGI)
Calculation supplied
max(28,000, 3.5% × 1,025,280) = max(28,000, 35,884.80) = 35,884.80
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
377,884.8
Expected
377,884.8
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Underwriting treatment by category)
Calculation supplied
Taxes 138,000 + Insurance 45,600 + Utilities 33,600 + R&M (54,000 - 12,000 one-time) 42,000 + Payroll 55,200 + Admin 27,600 + Mgmt 35,884.80 = 377,884.80
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
647,395.2
Expected
647,395.2
Response evidence
Derived from underwriting plan inputs
Calculation supplied
UW EGI 1,025,280 - UW OpEx 377,884.80 = 647,395.20
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
15,600
Expected
15,600
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Reserves $325 per unit per year); Rent-Roll.xlsx (48 units)
Calculation supplied
$325 × 48 units = $15,600
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
631,795.2
Expected
631,795.2
Response evidence
Derived from underwriting plan inputs
Calculation supplied
UW NOI before reserves 647,395.20 - Reserves 15,600 = 631,795.20
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
11,259,046.96
Expected
11,259,046.956522
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Value = UW NOI BEFORE reserves / 5.75% cap)
Calculation supplied
647,395.20 / 0.0575 = 11,259,046.96
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0625
Expected
0.0625
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Contract rate 6.25% fixed)
Calculation supplied
As stated
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.065
Expected
0.065
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Sizing rate = greater of contract and 6.50% floor)
Calculation supplied
max(0.0625, 0.0650) = 0.0650
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.075865
Expected
0.075848
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (30-year, monthly payments; sizing rate 6.50%)
Calculation supplied
Monthly i = 0.065/12; Monthly factor = i / (1 - (1+i)^-360) ≈ 0.006322; Annual constant = 12 × 0.006322 ≈ 0.075865
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,755,428.18
Expected
6,755,428.173913
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (LTV 60% of indicative value)
Calculation supplied
0.60 × 11,259,046.96 = 6,755,428.18
dscr_limitValue failed
Reported
6,406,067.5
Expected
6,407,489.510999
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (DSCR ≥1.30x using NCF/annual amortizing DS at sizing rate)
Calculation supplied
Max DS = 631,795.20 / 1.30 = 485,996.31; Max loan = 485,996.31 / 0.075865 ≈ 6,406,067.50
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
7,019,946.67
Expected
7,019,946.666667
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Debt yield ≥9.00%; numerator UW NCF after reserves)
Calculation supplied
631,795.20 / 0.09 = 7,019,946.67
maximum_loanValue failed
Reported
6,406,067.5
Expected
6,407,489.510999
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Loan ceiling = lowest of LTV, DSCR, debt yield)
Calculation supplied
min(6,755,428.18, 6,406,067.50, 7,019,946.67) = 6,406,067.50
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Comparison of the three sizing constraints above
Calculation supplied
DSCR limit is the minimum
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
485,996.31
Expected
485,996.307692
Response evidence
Derived at maximum_loan using sizing rate and amortization
Calculation supplied
6,406,067.50 × 0.075865 = 485,996.31
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.3
Expected
1.3
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (DSCR definition) and computed DS
Calculation supplied
UW NCF 631,795.20 / 485,996.31 = 1.30x
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.09866
Expected
0.098603
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Debt yield = NCF after reserves / loan)
Calculation supplied
631,795.20 / 6,406,067.50 = 0.09866 (9.866%)
first_year_debt_serviceValue failed
Reported
400,379.22
Expected
400,468.094437
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (36 months interest-only; contractual rate 6.25%)
Calculation supplied
Interest-only Year 1 = 6,406,067.50 × 0.0625 = 400,379.22
cash_to_borrowerValue failed
Reported
1,777,006.83
Expected
1,778,414.615889
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (Existing payoff $4,500,000; Fixed closing $65,000); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (1.00% origination fee)
Calculation supplied
Net = Loan 6,406,067.50 - Payoff 4,500,000 - Origination (1% × 6,406,067.50 = 64,060.68) - Closing 65,000 = 1,777,006.83
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
597,925.44
Expected
597,925.44
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Sensitivity instruction: reduce EGI by 5%, recompute management; others unchanged)
Calculation supplied
Stressed EGI = 1,025,280 × 0.95 = 974,016; Stressed Mgmt = max(28,000, 3.5%×974,016=34,090.56) = 34,090.56; Stressed OpEx = 377,884.80 - 35,884.80 + 34,090.56 = 376,090.56; Stressed NOI = 974,016 - 376,090.56 = 597,925.44
stress_maximum_loanValue failed
Reported
5,339,210
Expected
5,338,641.202314
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Sensitivity); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (sizing definitions)
Calculation supplied
With EGI -5%: Stressed NCF = 597,925.44 - 15,600 = 582,325.44. Sizing rate +100 bps => 7.50% (30-yr monthly), annual constant ≈ 0.083916. Constraints: LTV = 0.60 × (597,925.44/0.0575) = $6,239,221.98; DSCR = (582,325.44/1.30)/0.083916 = $5,339,210; Debt yield = 582,325.44/0.09 = $6,470,282.67. Minimum = $5,339,210 (DSCR).

Opus 5 agent · direct API control

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
48
Expected
48
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, 'Rent Roll', rows 7-54 (units 101-148, column C)
Calculation supplied
Count of unit rows 7-54 = 48 (24 units @700 SF: 101-124; 24 units @1,100 SF: 125-148)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
33
Expected
33
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, 'Rent Roll', column F rows 7-39 = 'Occupied'; rows 40-54 = 'Vacant'
Calculation supplied
Units 101-133 occupied = 33; units 134-148 vacant = 15; 33 + 15 = 48
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
43,200
Expected
43,200
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, 'Rent Roll', column E rows 7-54
Calculation supplied
(24 x 700) + (24 x 1,100) = 16,800 + 26,400 = 43,200
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
26,700
Expected
26,700
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, 'Rent Roll', columns E/F rows 7-39
Calculation supplied
(24 x 700 = 16,800 for units 101-124) + (9 x 1,100 = 9,900 for units 125-133) = 26,700
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
68.75
Expected
68.75
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, 'Rent Roll', column F rows 7-54
Calculation supplied
33 / 48 x 100 = 68.75
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
61.81
Expected
61.805556
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, 'Rent Roll', columns E/F rows 7-54
Calculation supplied
26,700 / 43,200 x 100 = 61.8056 -> 61.81
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
56,025
Expected
56,025
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, 'Rent Roll', column G rows 7-39 (rows 40-54 blank = vacant, no contractual rent; note C57)
Calculation supplied
(24 x 1,575 = 37,800) + (9 x 2,025 = 18,225) = 56,025 per month
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
56,025
Expected
56,025
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column G rows 7-39; Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.3 (unit 101 base rent $1,575/mo as of 2026-08-31) and s.6 (amendment authority clause)
Calculation supplied
No executed amendment is included in the packet, and the executed lease for unit 101 ($1,575/mo) agrees with the rent roll. Therefore effective = as-printed = 56,025. No adjustment applied.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
691,200
Expected
691,200
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, 'Annual' column: GPR 1,036,800; vacancy -302,400; concessions -64,800; bad debt -8,400; other income 30,000
Calculation supplied
1,036,800 - 302,400 - 64,800 - 8,400 + 30,000 = 691,200
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
371,200
Expected
371,200
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 'Annual' column: taxes 132,000; insurance 40,800; utilities 33,600; R&M 54,000; payroll 55,200; admin/legal 27,600; management 28,000. Reserves 14,400, capex 184,000, P&I 294,000 and depreciation 180,000 are excluded per p.1/p.2 footnote and Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1
Calculation supplied
132,000 + 40,800 + 33,600 + 54,000 + 55,200 + 27,600 + 28,000 = 371,200
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
320,000
Expected
320,000
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2 'Annual' column (no NOI subtotal is printed on the statement)
Calculation supplied
691,200 - 371,200 = 320,000
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
14,400
Expected
14,400
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, 'Replacement reserves (below NOI)', Annual column
Calculation supplied
As reported: 14,400 (monthly 1,128-1,272)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
305,600
Expected
305,600
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2; Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (accounting package may label cash flow after reserves as 'property NOI')
Calculation supplied
320,000 - 14,400 = 305,600
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,575
Expected
1,575
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.3 ('Base rent is $1,575 per month as of August 31, 2026'); corroborated by Rent-Roll.xlsx G7 = 1575
Calculation supplied
Executed lease and rent roll agree; no signed amendment in packet, so no override applied
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2027-06-30
Expected
2027-06-30
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.2 ('initial term expires 2027-06-30'); Rent-Roll.xlsx I7 = '2027-06-30'
Calculation supplied
Not extended for the renewal option: Lease-File.pdf s.5 states no exercise notice, acknowledgment or amendment is included and directs that the expiry not be extended on the option's existence alone
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,200
Expected
1,200
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.4 ('security deposit is $1,200 and is not prepaid rent or recurring income')
Calculation supplied
Not included in income; balance-sheet item only. Not shown on the rent roll.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.5 ('No exercise notice, landlord acknowledgment or amendment exercising this option is included in the packet'); Rent-Roll.xlsx C59 ('no option exercise notice is included')
Calculation supplied
No evidence of exercise in the delivered materials; option remains conditional (no uncured default plus written notice at least 180 days before the 2027-06-30 expiry, i.e., by approximately 2027-01-01)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
1,025,280
Expected
1,025,280
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2: GPR $1,056,000; combined revenue loss 7.00% of underwritten GPR; other income/recoveries $43,200 added after revenue loss
Calculation supplied
1,056,000 x (1 - 0.07) = 982,080; 982,080 + 43,200 = 1,025,280
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
35,884.8
Expected
35,884.8
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 ('Greater of T12 actual and 3.50% of underwritten EGI'); T12 actual 28,000 per T12-Statement.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
max(28,000; 0.035 x 1,025,280 = 35,884.80) = 35,884.80
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
377,884.8
Expected
377,884.8
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 expense table (taxes 138,000; insurance 45,600; utilities T12 33,600; R&M 54,000 less 12,000 one-time casualty = 42,000; payroll 55,200; admin/legal 27,600) plus management fee
Calculation supplied
138,000 + 45,600 + 33,600 + 42,000 + 55,200 + 27,600 = 342,000 non-management; + 35,884.80 = 377,884.80
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
647,395.2
Expected
647,395.2
Response evidence
Derived from Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 plan
Calculation supplied
1,025,280 - 377,884.80 = 647,395.20
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
15,600
Expected
15,600
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 ($325.00 per unit per year, deducted after NOI); unit count 48 from Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7-54
Calculation supplied
325.00 x 48 = 15,600
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
631,795.2
Expected
631,795.2
Response evidence
Derived from Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
647,395.20 - 15,600 = 631,795.20
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
11,258,177.39
Expected
11,259,046.956522
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1, 'Valuation' (underwritten NOI BEFORE reserves / 5.75% cap rate; no appraisal implied)
Calculation supplied
647,395.20 / 0.0575 = 11,258,177.3913
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0625
Expected
0.0625
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1, 'Contract rate' (6.25% fixed)
Calculation supplied
6.25% / 100 = 0.0625
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.065
Expected
0.065
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1, 'Sizing rate' (greater of current contractual rate and 6.50% floor)
Calculation supplied
max(0.0625; 0.0650) = 0.0650
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.075848
Expected
0.075848
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 ('Amortization' 30 years, monthly payments, annual debt service = 12 monthly payments; sizing rate 6.50%)
Calculation supplied
i = 0.065/12 = 0.00541667; n = 360; monthly factor = i / (1 - (1+i)^-360) = 0.00541667 / 0.85697526 = 0.00632068; x 12 = 0.07584816
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,754,906.43
Expected
6,755,428.173913
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1, 'LTV' 60.00% of indicative value
Calculation supplied
0.60 x 11,258,177.3913 = 6,754,906.4348
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
6,407,489.44
Expected
6,407,489.510999
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1, 'DSCR' minimum 1.30x using NCF after reserves / annual amortizing debt service at sizing rate
Calculation supplied
631,795.20 / (1.30 x 0.07584816) = 631,795.20 / 0.09860261 = 6,407,489.44
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
7,019,946.67
Expected
7,019,946.666667
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1, 'Debt yield' minimum 9.00%, numerator underwritten NCF AFTER reserves
Calculation supplied
631,795.20 / 0.0900 = 7,019,946.6667
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
6,407,489.44
Expected
6,407,489.510999
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1, 'Loan ceiling' = lowest of LTV, DSCR and debt-yield constraints; no separate dollar cap
Calculation supplied
min(6,754,906.43; 6,407,489.44; 7,019,946.67) = 6,407,489.44
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 constraint table
Calculation supplied
DSCR limit is the minimum; it is 347,417 below the LTV limit and 612,457 below the debt-yield limit
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
485,996.31
Expected
485,996.307692
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (amortizing debt service at sizing rate, 12 monthly payments)
Calculation supplied
6,407,489.44 x 0.07584816 = 485,996.31 (equivalently 631,795.20 / 1.30, since DSCR binds)
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.3
Expected
1.3
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 DSCR definition (NCF after reserves / amortizing DS at sizing rate)
Calculation supplied
631,795.20 / 485,996.31 = 1.3000
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.098603
Expected
0.098603
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 debt-yield definition (numerator = underwritten NCF after reserves)
Calculation supplied
631,795.20 / 6,407,489.44 = 0.0986026 (9.86%, above the 9.00% minimum)
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
400,468.09
Expected
400,468.094437
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1: 'Contract rate' 6.25% and 'Interest-only period' 36 months (underwriting DSCR still uses amortizing debt service)
Calculation supplied
6,407,489.44 x 0.0625 = 400,468.09 (interest-only; monthly 33,372.34). Sizing DS of 485,996.31 is 85,528.22 higher and is used only for DSCR.
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
1,778,414.55
Expected
1,778,414.615889
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (existing debt payoff $4,500,000; fixed closing costs $65,000); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (origination fee 1.00% of actual initial principal; no fee capitalization/interest reserve/holdback)
Calculation supplied
6,407,489.44 - 4,500,000 - (0.01 x 6,407,489.44 = 64,074.89) - 65,000 = 1,778,414.55 (positive = cash out to borrower)
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
597,925.44
Expected
597,925.44
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 sensitivity instruction (reduce total underwritten EGI by 5%, recompute management minimum, hold all other operating expense and reserve assumptions constant)
Calculation supplied
EGI 1,025,280 x 0.95 = 974,016; management = max(28,000; 0.035 x 974,016 = 34,090.56) = 34,090.56; other opex unchanged 342,000; total opex 376,090.56; NOI before reserves = 974,016 - 376,090.56 = 597,925.44 (stress NCF after 15,600 reserves = 582,325.44)
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
5,338,647.5
Expected
5,338,641.202314
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (combined downside: EGI -5% and sizing rate +100 bps, cap rate constant); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 constraints
Calculation supplied
Stress sizing rate 7.50%: i=0.00625, monthly factor 0.00699214, annual constant 0.08390564. Value = 597,925.44/0.0575 = 10,398,703.30 -> LTV limit 6,239,221.98. DSCR limit = 582,325.44/(1.30 x 0.08390564) = 582,325.44/0.10907733 = 5,338,647.50. Debt-yield limit = 582,325.44/0.09 = 6,470,282.67. Minimum = 5,338,647.50 (DSCR binding; -1,068,841.94 vs base)

Back to the complete comparison