Workflow v1 / 30 completed workflows

Hawthorn Center

Inspect the source packet, compare each system’s work, and read the exact findings behind the score.

The five original source files

Lev Agent

All 39 headline source and financial checks passed.

All 39 requested source and financial checks pass and the workbook passes all ten acceptance checks. The memo correctly handles the swap caveat but overstates downside cash-out in its opening recommendation; later pages give the correct amount.

Material claims to inspect

PDF p.1 financing decision — Downside cash-out is roughly $1.06 million after fees.

Source-supported finding: 5,313,426.592763869 × (1 − .008) − 4,200,000 − 52,000 = 1,018,919.1800217582.

The opening recommendation overstates downside net proceeds by approximately 4%; later pages correct it.

All review findings (2)
  • Opening downside cash-out should be $1,018,919.18: $5,313,426.59 × 99.2% − $4.2M payoff − $52,000 closing. The $1.06M claim overstates it by about $41,081.
  • Six pages are readable; the property and financial tables remain legible.
Every artifact acceptance check (19/20)
Work productCheckOutcomeEvidence
Memo1PassA real PDF was downloaded and all pages rendered with readable main content.
Original PDF and full-page render review
Memo2PassThe memo identifies the named property, August 31, 2026 as-of date and first-mortgage refinance purpose.
PDF opening title, property table and recommendation
Memo3PassBase loan, existing payoff, loan-based fee, fixed closing costs and net borrower cash reconcile to the supplied scenario.
PDF sources/uses and independently checked key
Memo4PassHistorical T12 and forward underwriting are labeled separately, with NOI before reserves and NCF after reserves.
PDF historical and underwriting tables; original T12 and plan
Memo5PassLoan constraints, binding minimum and debt-service/coverage figures follow the lender terms.
PDF financing/sizing section; Lender-Terms.pdf
Memo6PassOccupancy and the subject lease are discussed against the supplied rent roll and controlling executed document.
PDF property/lease discussion; Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf
Memo7FailOpening downside cash-out is inconsistent with its own later analysis and the fee-inclusive calculation.
PDF p.1: roughly $1.06 million after fees; pp.3 and 5: approximately $1,019,000.
Memo8PassThe supplied forecast, lender conventions and any provisional items are labeled as assumptions.
PDF assumptions and limitations; Property-and-Plan.pdf
Memo9PassThe memorandum identifies the five source files and their relevant content.
PDF source references and source pointers in the analysis
Memo10PassRendered headings, tables and financial values are readable with no materially clipped content.
Full-page PDF rendering inspection
Workbook1PassXLSX opens
Workbook2PassInputs, units, date and source references are identifiable.
Delivered input/instruction/source sheets; non-formula cell inspection
Workbook3PassHistorical and forward cash flows are separate and their totals reconcile.
Recalculated historical sheet totals and original T12; independently tested underwriting outputs
Workbook4Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":629760,"expected":629760,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":625440,"expected":625440,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":6261936.6076267,"expected":6261936.6076267185,"passed":true}]
Workbook5Pass{"uw_noi_before_reserves":true,"uw_ncf":true,"maximum_loan":true,"capitalization_value":true,"dscr_limit":true}
Workbook6Pass[{"field":"capitalization_value","actual":9329777.77777778,"expected":9329777.777777778,"passed":true},{"field":"ltv_limit","actual":5831111.11111111,"expected":5831111.111111111,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5831111.11111111,"expected":5831111.111111111,"passed":true}]
Workbook7Pass[{"field":"dscr_limit","actual":5717561.19445978,"expected":5717561.194459818,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5717561.19445978,"expected":5717561.194459818,"passed":true}]
Workbook8Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":585552,"expected":585552,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":581232,"expected":581232,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5819323.89729484,"expected":5819323.897294822,"passed":true}]
Workbook9Pass{"formula_errors":[],"external_links_or_macros":[]}
Workbook10PassMain underwriting labels and numbers are visible and a reviewer can locate assumptions and decision outputs.
Main underwriting sheet rendered at 1.3 scale; input and sizing cells inspected

Inference: $4.030. PostHog trace estimate using OpenRouter model rates; two charged generation events; duplicate run-summary event excluded

Read the analysis, checks and execution record

GPT-5 agent

All 39 headline source and financial checks passed.

All 39 requested source and financial checks pass. The model recalculates correctly but lacks workbook source references. Memo rent-roll citations point to the wrong source coordinates.

All review findings (2)
  • The wrong citation addresses match the model-created workbook layout, not the original Rent-Roll.xlsx source.
  • Six-page memo is readable; missing arrow glyphs are a polish issue, with all numeric tables intact.
Every artifact acceptance check (18/20)
Work productCheckOutcomeEvidence
Memo1PassA real PDF was downloaded and all pages rendered with readable main content.
Original PDF and full-page render review
Memo2PassThe memo identifies the named property, August 31, 2026 as-of date and first-mortgage refinance purpose.
PDF opening title, property table and recommendation
Memo3PassBase loan, existing payoff, loan-based fee, fixed closing costs and net borrower cash reconcile to the supplied scenario.
PDF sources/uses and independently checked key
Memo4PassHistorical T12 and forward underwriting are labeled separately, with NOI before reserves and NCF after reserves.
PDF historical and underwriting tables; original T12 and plan
Memo5PassLoan constraints, binding minimum and debt-service/coverage figures follow the lender terms.
PDF financing/sizing section; Lender-Terms.pdf
Memo6PassOccupancy and the subject lease are discussed against the supplied rent roll and controlling executed document.
PDF property/lease discussion; Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf
Memo7PassSensitivity, missing diligence and financing risks are disclosed without unsupported numerical conclusions.
PDF sensitivity and risk/limitations sections
Memo8PassThe supplied forecast, lender conventions and any provisional items are labeled as assumptions.
PDF assumptions and limitations; Property-and-Plan.pdf
Memo9FailRent-roll citations refer to incorrect source rows and columns. Correct figures do not make those locations valid.
PDF pp.5–6: rows 4–13, C4–C13, E4–E12 and B18–B22. Original Rent Roll source uses C7:I16; base rent is G7:G16.
Memo10PassRendered headings, tables and financial values are readable with no materially clipped content.
Full-page PDF rendering inspection
Workbook1PassXLSX opens
Workbook2FailThe delivered workbook has input labels and a date but no source-file or source-location references.
All non-formula workbook cells inspected; zero PDF/XLSX source references.
Workbook3PassHistorical and forward cash flows are separate and their totals reconcile.
Recalculated historical sheet totals and original T12; independently tested underwriting outputs
Workbook4Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":629760,"expected":629760,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":625440,"expected":625440,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":6261936.6076267,"expected":6261936.6076267185,"passed":true}]
Workbook5Pass{"uw_noi_before_reserves":true,"uw_ncf":true,"maximum_loan":true,"capitalization_value":true,"dscr_limit":true}
Workbook6Pass[{"field":"capitalization_value","actual":9329777.77777778,"expected":9329777.777777778,"passed":true},{"field":"ltv_limit","actual":5831111.11111111,"expected":5831111.111111111,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5831111.11111111,"expected":5831111.111111111,"passed":true}]
Workbook7Pass[{"field":"dscr_limit","actual":5717561.19445978,"expected":5717561.194459818,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5717561.19445978,"expected":5717561.194459818,"passed":true}]
Workbook8Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":585552,"expected":585552,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":581232,"expected":581232,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5819323.89729484,"expected":5819323.897294822,"passed":true}]
Workbook9Pass{"formula_errors":[],"external_links_or_macros":[]}
Workbook10PassMain underwriting labels and numbers are visible and a reviewer can locate assumptions and decision outputs.
Main underwriting sheet rendered at 1.3 scale; input and sizing cells inspected

Inference: $0.261. Gateway usage.cost; all attempts included; absent usage remains unknown

Read the analysis, checks and execution record

Opus 5 agent

All 39 headline source and financial checks passed.

All 39 headline checks and all workbook and memo acceptance checks pass. The memo preserves NOI-based debt yield versus NCF-based DSCR, the swap exit caveat and positive downside cash-out.

All review findings (2)
  • Eight-page memo is readable but verbose. Source references distinguish original source coordinates from the companion workbook.
  • The origination fee is displayed as $50,096 rather than nearest-dollar $50,095; the difference is within the $1 tolerance and net proceeds are correct.
Every artifact acceptance check (20/20)
Work productCheckOutcomeEvidence
Memo1PassA real PDF was downloaded and all pages rendered with readable main content.
Original PDF and full-page render review
Memo2PassThe memo identifies the named property, August 31, 2026 as-of date and first-mortgage refinance purpose.
PDF opening title, property table and recommendation
Memo3PassBase loan, existing payoff, loan-based fee, fixed closing costs and net borrower cash reconcile to the supplied scenario.
PDF sources/uses and independently checked key
Memo4PassHistorical T12 and forward underwriting are labeled separately, with NOI before reserves and NCF after reserves.
PDF historical and underwriting tables; original T12 and plan
Memo5PassLoan constraints, binding minimum and debt-service/coverage figures follow the lender terms.
PDF financing/sizing section; Lender-Terms.pdf
Memo6PassOccupancy and the subject lease are discussed against the supplied rent roll and controlling executed document.
PDF property/lease discussion; Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf
Memo7PassSensitivity, missing diligence and financing risks are disclosed without unsupported numerical conclusions.
PDF sensitivity and risk/limitations sections
Memo8PassThe supplied forecast, lender conventions and any provisional items are labeled as assumptions.
PDF assumptions and limitations; Property-and-Plan.pdf
Memo9PassThe memorandum identifies the five source files and their relevant content.
PDF source references and source pointers in the analysis
Memo10PassRendered headings, tables and financial values are readable with no materially clipped content.
Full-page PDF rendering inspection
Workbook1PassXLSX opens
Workbook2PassInputs, units, date and source references are identifiable.
Delivered input/instruction/source sheets; non-formula cell inspection
Workbook3PassHistorical and forward cash flows are separate and their totals reconcile.
Recalculated historical sheet totals and original T12; independently tested underwriting outputs
Workbook4Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":629760,"expected":629760,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":625440,"expected":625440,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":6261936.6076267,"expected":6261936.6076267185,"passed":true}]
Workbook5Pass{"uw_noi_before_reserves":true,"uw_ncf":true,"maximum_loan":true,"capitalization_value":true,"dscr_limit":true}
Workbook6Pass[{"field":"capitalization_value","actual":9329777.77777778,"expected":9329777.777777778,"passed":true},{"field":"ltv_limit","actual":5831111.11111111,"expected":5831111.111111111,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5831111.11111111,"expected":5831111.111111111,"passed":true}]
Workbook7Pass[{"field":"dscr_limit","actual":5717561.19445978,"expected":5717561.194459818,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5717561.19445978,"expected":5717561.194459818,"passed":true}]
Workbook8Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":585552,"expected":585552,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":581232,"expected":581232,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5819323.89729484,"expected":5819323.897294822,"passed":true}]
Workbook9Pass{"formula_errors":[],"external_links_or_macros":[]}
Workbook10PassMain underwriting labels and numbers are visible and a reviewer can locate assumptions and decision outputs.
Main underwriting sheet rendered at 1.3 scale; input and sizing cells inspected

Inference: $3.231. Gateway usage.cost; all attempts included; absent usage remains unknown

Read the analysis, checks and execution record

Inspect every reported value

The same 39 source and financial checks apply to every system. Open a row to see the response citation and review rationale. Direct controls are labeled separately.

Lev Agent

space_countValue passedCitation failed
Reported
10
Expected
10
Response evidence
Rent roll row count
Review
Filename-only table heading and no complete correct original source location. Area column C and rent column E refer to the wrong source columns; derived fields inherit the unsupported inputs.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
occupied_countValue passedCitation failed
Reported
9
Expected
9
Response evidence
9 of 10 units occupied
Review
Filename-only table heading and no complete correct original source location. Area column C and rent column E refer to the wrong source columns; derived fields inherit the unsupported inputs.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
total_area_sfValue passedCitation failed
Reported
28,800
Expected
28,800
Response evidence
Sum of column C
Review
Filename-only table heading and no complete correct original source location. Area column C and rent column E refer to the wrong source columns; derived fields inherit the unsupported inputs.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
occupied_area_sfValue passedCitation failed
Reported
27,200
Expected
27,200
Response evidence
Excludes Unit 110 vacancy
Review
Filename-only table heading and no complete correct original source location. Area column C and rent column E refer to the wrong source columns; derived fields inherit the unsupported inputs.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
occupancy_count_pctValue passedCitation failed
Reported
90.00
Expected
90
Response evidence
9 ÷ 10 × 100
Review
Filename-only table heading and no complete correct original source location. Area column C and rent column E refer to the wrong source columns; derived fields inherit the unsupported inputs.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
occupancy_area_pctValue passedCitation failed
Reported
94.44
Expected
94.444444
Response evidence
27,200 ÷ 28,800 × 100
Review
Filename-only table heading and no complete correct original source location. Area column C and rent column E refer to the wrong source columns; derived fields inherit the unsupported inputs.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedCitation failed
Reported
$60,000
Expected
60,000
Response evidence
Sum of column E (rent-roll printed monthly base rent)
Review
Filename-only table heading and no complete correct original source location. Area column C and rent column E refer to the wrong source columns; derived fields inherit the unsupported inputs.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
effective_monthly_baseValue passedCitation failed
Reported
$60,000
Expected
60,000
Response evidence
No amendment overrides rent-roll totals. Lease-File.pdf §3 confirms Unit 101 $3,000/mo
Review
Filename-only table heading and no complete correct original source location. Area column C and rent column E refer to the wrong source columns; derived fields inherit the unsupported inputs.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
t12_egiValue passedCitation failed
Reported
$866,400
Expected
866,400
Response evidence
GPR 759,600 + Other 176,400 − (Vac 40,800 + Conc 22,800 + Bad 6,000)
Review
Historical amounts and arithmetic are correct, but the final T12 table cites no page or named source clause.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
t12_operating_expensesValue passedCitation failed
Reported
$264,000
Expected
264,000
Response evidence
Tax 114 + Ins 32.4 + Util 21.6 + R&M 36 + Payroll 24 + Admin 18 + Mgmt 18 (in $000). Excludes reserves, capex, debt, depreciation
Review
Historical amounts and arithmetic are correct, but the final T12 table cites no page or named source clause.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedCitation failed
Reported
$602,400
Expected
602,400
Response evidence
EGI − OpEx
Review
Historical amounts and arithmetic are correct, but the final T12 table cites no page or named source clause.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
t12_reservesValue passedCitation failed
Reported
$11,520
Expected
11,520
Response evidence
T12 replacement reserves (below NOI)
Review
Historical amounts and arithmetic are correct, but the final T12 table cites no page or named source clause.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
t12_ncfValue passedCitation failed
Reported
$590,880
Expected
590,880
Response evidence
NOI − reserves. Capex $74,000, debt P&I $294,000, depreciation $180,000 shown below cash flow per plan; excluded from OpEx
Review
Historical amounts and arithmetic are correct, but the final T12 table cites no page or named source clause.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
$3,000
Expected
3,000
Response evidence
Lease §3
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2029-08-31
Expected
2029-08-31
Response evidence
Lease §2. §5 renewal option not exercised on evidence supplied
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
$6,000
Expected
6,000
Response evidence
Lease §4 (not prepaid rent)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease §5: option exists; no exercise notice, landlord acknowledgment, or amendment supplied
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
Scoped response context
Rent roll — as of 2026-08-31 (source: Rent-Roll.xlsx)
Historical T12 (Sep-2025 through Aug-2026, source: T12-Statement.pdf)
Subject lease — Unit 101 (source: Lease-File.pdf)
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
$921,000
Expected
921,000
Response evidence
GPR 780,000 − 5% loss (39,000) + Other 180,000
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
$36,840
Expected
36,840
Response evidence
MAX(T12 $18,000; 4% × EGI $36,840) — 4% × EGI binds
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
$291,240
Expected
291,240
Response evidence
Tax 120 (plan) + Ins 34.8 (renewal) + Util 21.6 (T12) + R&M 36 (T12, no removal) + Payroll 24 (T12) + Admin 18 (T12) + Mgmt 36.84
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
$629,760
Expected
629,760
Response evidence
EGI − OpEx
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
$4,320
Expected
4,320
Response evidence
$0.15 × 28,800 SF
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
$625,440
Expected
625,440
Response evidence
NOI − reserves
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
$10,076,160
Expected
10,076,160
Response evidence
629,760 ÷ 6.25% cap
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0635
Expected
0.0635
Response evidence
Term sheet: 6.35% fixed
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0635
Expected
0.0635
Response evidence
MAX(contract, 6.35% floor)
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.079904
Expected
0.079904
Response evidence
PMT(6.35%/12, 300, 1) × 12
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
$6,297,600
Expected
6,297,600
Response evidence
$10,076,160 × 62.50%
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
$6,261,937
Expected
6,261,936.607627
Response evidence
$625,440 ÷ 1.25 ÷ 0.079904
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
$6,997,333
Expected
6,997,333.333333
Response evidence
$629,760 ÷ 9.00%
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
$6,261,937
Expected
6,261,936.607627
Response evidence
MIN of the three
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
1.25x binds
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
$500,352
Expected
500,352
Response evidence
Max loan × debt constant
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.25x
Expected
1.25
Response evidence
$625,440 ÷ $500,352 (by construction)
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
10.06%
Expected
0.10057
Response evidence
$629,760 ÷ $6,261,937
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
$500,352
Expected
500,352
Response evidence
IO = 0 months → contract-rate amortizing DS (contract = sizing rate here)
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
+$1,959,841
Expected
1,959,841.114766
Response evidence
Loan $6,261,937 − Payoff $4,200,000 − Origination $50,095 (0.80%) − Fixed closing $52,000. Positive = cash-out
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
$585,552
Expected
585,552
Response evidence
EGI −5% ($874,950); mgmt recalc $34,998; other OpEx unchanged
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
$5,313,427
Expected
5,313,426.592764
Response evidence
Combined downside: EGI −5% AND sizing rate +100 bps (to 7.35%); cap rate unchanged. DSCR still binds

GPT-5 agent

space_countValue passedCitation failed
Reported
10
Expected
10
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx R16 (Space count 10)
Calculation supplied
Count of rows with suites 101–110 per rent roll totals.
Review
Citations point to the model-created workbook layout rather than the original source Rent Roll!C7:I16. Original area is E7:E16, rent is G7:G16.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_countValue passedCitation failed
Reported
9
Expected
9
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx R17 (Occupied count 9)
Calculation supplied
Occupied count from rent roll totals.
Review
Citations point to the model-created workbook layout rather than the original source Rent Roll!C7:I16. Original area is E7:E16, rent is G7:G16.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
total_area_sfValue passedCitation failed
Reported
28,800
Expected
28,800
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx B18 (Total area SF =SUM(C4:C13)=28,800)
Calculation supplied
Sum of suite areas 101–110.
Review
Citations point to the model-created workbook layout rather than the original source Rent Roll!C7:I16. Original area is E7:E16, rent is G7:G16.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_area_sfValue passedCitation failed
Reported
27,200
Expected
27,200
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx B19 (Occupied area SF =SUMIF(...)=27,200)
Calculation supplied
Sum of occupied suite areas.
Review
Citations point to the model-created workbook layout rather than the original source Rent Roll!C7:I16. Original area is E7:E16, rent is G7:G16.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_count_pctValue passedCitation failed
Reported
90
Expected
90
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx B20 (Occupancy by count % = 90.00%)
Calculation supplied
Occupied count / space count = 9/10 = 90%.
Review
Citations point to the model-created workbook layout rather than the original source Rent Roll!C7:I16. Original area is E7:E16, rent is G7:G16.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_area_pctValue passedCitation failed
Reported
94.444444
Expected
94.444444
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx B21 (Occupancy by area % = 94.44%)
Calculation supplied
Occupied area / total area = 27,200 / 28,800.
Review
Citations point to the model-created workbook layout rather than the original source Rent Roll!C7:I16. Original area is E7:E16, rent is G7:G16.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedCitation failed
Reported
60,000
Expected
60,000
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx B22 (Monthly base rent (as printed) = $60,000)
Calculation supplied
Sum of monthly base rent for occupied suites.
Review
Citations point to the model-created workbook layout rather than the original source Rent Roll!C7:I16. Original area is E7:E16, rent is G7:G16.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
effective_monthly_baseValue passedCitation failed
Reported
60,000
Expected
60,000
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx E4–E12 (occupied monthly base); Lease-File.pdf p.1 §3 (Suite 101 $3,000/mo, no increases before 2027-09-01)
Calculation supplied
No lease amendments contradicting rent roll provided; Suite 101 confirmed at $3,000/mo. Therefore effective equals printed: $60,000/mo.
Review
Citations point to the model-created workbook layout rather than the original source Rent Roll!C7:I16. Original area is E7:E16, rent is G7:G16.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
866,400
Expected
866,400
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual (GPR 759,600; Vacancy 40,800; Concessions 22,800; Bad debt 6,000; Other income 176,400)
Calculation supplied
759,600 - 40,800 - 22,800 - 6,000 + 176,400 = 866,400.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
264,000
Expected
264,000
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual (Taxes 114,000; Insurance 32,400; Utilities 21,600; R&M 36,000; Payroll 24,000; Admin/Legal 18,000; Mgmt 18,000)
Calculation supplied
Sum of listed operating expenses before reserves = 264,000.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
602,400
Expected
602,400
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual (calculated)
Calculation supplied
866,400 - 264,000 = 602,400.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
11,520
Expected
11,520
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual (Replacement reserves 11,520)
Calculation supplied
As reported.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
590,880
Expected
590,880
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual (NCF after reserves calculated)
Calculation supplied
602,400 - 11,520 = 590,880.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
3,000
Expected
3,000
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §3 (Base rent $3,000 per month as of 2026-08-31)
Calculation supplied
As stated.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2029-08-31
Expected
2029-08-31
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §2 (Initial term expires 2029-08-31)
Calculation supplied
As stated.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
6,000
Expected
6,000
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §4 (Security deposit $6,000)
Calculation supplied
As stated.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §5 (No exercise notice included; do not extend based on option alone)
Calculation supplied
No delivered evidence of exercise.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
921,000
Expected
921,000
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (GPR 780,000; loss 5%; other 180,000)
Calculation supplied
780,000*(1-0.05)+180,000 = 921,000.
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
36,840
Expected
36,840
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Mgmt fee greater of T12 actual and 4% of EGI); T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (T12 mgmt 18,000)
Calculation supplied
max(18,000, 0.04*921,000)=36,840.
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
291,240
Expected
291,240
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Taxes 120,000; Insurance renewal 34,800; Utilities 21,600; R&M 36,000; Payroll 24,000; Admin 18,000; Mgmt per calc)
Calculation supplied
120,000+34,800+21,600+36,000+24,000+18,000+36,840=291,240.
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
629,760
Expected
629,760
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (scenario, expense treatments); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (valuation NOI before reserves)
Calculation supplied
UW EGI 921,000 - UW opex 291,240 = 629,760.
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
4,320
Expected
4,320
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Reserves $0.15/SF/year) ; Rent-Roll.xlsx B18 (28,800 SF)
Calculation supplied
28,800 * $0.15 = 4,320.
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
625,440
Expected
625,440
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (DSCR uses NCF after reserves); calculations above
Calculation supplied
629,760 - 4,320 = 625,440.
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
10,076,160
Expected
10,076,160
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Cap rate 6.25%); Underwriting calc above
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 0.0625 = 10,076,160.
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0635
Expected
0.0635
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Contract rate 6.35% fixed)
Calculation supplied
As stated.
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0635
Expected
0.0635
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Sizing rate greater of contract and 6.35% floor)
Calculation supplied
Contract equals floor; 6.35% used.
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.079904
Expected
0.079904
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (25-yr amort, monthly); calculated PMT at 6.35%
Calculation supplied
12*PMT(0.0635/12, 300, 1) = 0.0799037153.
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,297,600
Expected
6,297,600
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (62.5% LTV) ; capitalization value above
Calculation supplied
0.625 * 10,076,160 = 6,297,600.
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
6,261,936.607627
Expected
6,261,936.607627
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (DSCR uses NCF after reserves / amort ADS >= 1.25x)
Calculation supplied
Loan <= NCF / (1.25 * constant) = 625,440 / (1.25 * 0.0799037153) = 6,261,936.61.
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
6,997,333.333333
Expected
6,997,333.333333
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Debt yield minimum 9% using NOI before reserves)
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 0.09 = 6,997,333.33.
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
6,261,936.607627
Expected
6,261,936.607627
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Lowest of LTV, DSCR, DY) ; constraints above
Calculation supplied
min(6,297,600; 6,261,936.61; 6,997,333.33) = 6,261,936.61.
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Constraint results above; DSCR is lowest
Calculation supplied
Compare LTV, DSCR, DY.
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
500,352
Expected
500,352
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1; PMT math at max loan
Calculation supplied
Loan * constant = 6,261,936.61 * 0.0799037153 = 500,352.
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.25
Expected
1.25
Response evidence
By construction at DSCR limit
Calculation supplied
NCF / ADS = 625,440 / 500,352 = 1.25x.
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.10057
Expected
0.10057
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (DY numerator NOI before reserves)
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 6,261,936.61 = 10.056952656%.
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
500,352
Expected
500,352
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (contract= sizing; IO 0 mo)
Calculation supplied
Equal to sizing ADS.
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
1,959,841.114766
Expected
1,959,841.114766
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (payoff $4.20MM; closing $52k) ; Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (0.80% fee)
Calculation supplied
Net proceeds = Loan*(1-0.008) - 4,200,000 - 52,000 = $1,959,841.11.
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
585,552
Expected
585,552
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 sensitivity instruction; Underwriting EGI and opex base
Calculation supplied
Stress EGI = 0.95*921,000 = 874,950. Mgmt = max(18,000, 4%*874,950=34,998). Other opex excl mgmt = 291,240-36,840=254,400. Stress NOI = 874,950 - (254,400+34,998)=585,552.
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
5,313,426.592764
Expected
5,313,426.592764
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1; stress sizing rate +100 bps; DSCR/LTV/DY recomputed
Calculation supplied
Constant at 7.35%/25y ⇒ 12*PMT(0.0735/12,300,1)=0.08751143765. Stress NCF = 585,552 - 4,320 = 581,232. Limits: LTV 0.625*(585,552/0.0625)=5,855,520; DSCR 581,232/(1.25*0.08751143765)=5,313,426.59; DY 585,552/0.09=6,506,133.33. Minimum = 5,313,426.59 (DSCR).

Opus 5 agent

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
10
Expected
10
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, worksheet 'Rent Roll', rows 7-16 (units 101-110) · Workbook 'Rent Roll'!C18
Calculation supplied
Count of unit rows 7-16 = 10
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
9
Expected
9
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7-15 status 'Occupied'; row 16 (unit 110) status 'Vacant'
Calculation supplied
10 total less 1 vacant = 9
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
28,800
Expected
28,800
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column E, rows 7-16
Calculation supplied
1400+1800+2200+2500+3000+3300+3800+4200+5000+1600 = 28,800
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
27,200
Expected
27,200
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column E, rows 7-15 (occupied)
Calculation supplied
28,800 - 1,600 (unit 110 vacant) = 27,200
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
90
Expected
90
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7-16 status column F
Calculation supplied
9/10 x 100 = 90.00
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
94.44
Expected
94.444444
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column E/F, rows 7-16
Calculation supplied
27,200/28,800 x 100 = 94.4444
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
60,000
Expected
60,000
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column G, rows 7-15; row 16 blank for vacant unit 110 · Rent-Roll.xlsx note row 19: blank contractual rent means no current rent for vacant premises
Calculation supplied
3000+4000+4900+5600+6500+7400+8600+9200+10800 = 60,000 (vacant suite excluded; market rent not income)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
60,000
Expected
60,000
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.3: base rent $3,000/month for premises 101 as of 2026-08-31 · Rent-Roll.xlsx row 7 shows $3,000 for unit 101; no amendment supplied (Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.6)
Calculation supplied
Rent roll $60,000 with unit 101 confirmed at $3,000 by executed lease; no authoritative amendment changes any rent, so effective = $60,000
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
866,400
Expected
866,400
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, Annual column: GPR 759,600; vacancy -40,800; concessions -22,800; bad debt -6,000; other income 176,400
Calculation supplied
759,600 - 40,800 - 22,800 - 6,000 + 176,400 = 866,400
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
264,000
Expected
264,000
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual: taxes 114,000; insurance 32,400; utilities 21,600; R&M 36,000; payroll 24,000; admin/legal 18,000; management 18,000 · Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1: debt, capital improvements and depreciation are not operating expenses
Calculation supplied
114,000+32,400+21,600+36,000+24,000+18,000+18,000 = 264,000 (excludes reserves 11,520, capex 74,000, P&I 294,000, depreciation 180,000)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
602,400
Expected
602,400
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
Calculation supplied
866,400 EGI - 264,000 opex = 602,400
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
11,520
Expected
11,520
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, 'Replacement reserves (below NOI)' Annual 11,520
Calculation supplied
As reported
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
590,880
Expected
590,880
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
Calculation supplied
602,400 - 11,520 = 590,880
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
3,000
Expected
3,000
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.3: base rent is $3,000 per month as of August 31, 2026; no increase before 2027-09-01 · Rent-Roll.xlsx row 7 agrees at $3,000
Calculation supplied
Executed lease controls; rent roll agrees, no amendment supplied
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2029-08-31
Expected
2029-08-31
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.2: initial term expires 2029-08-31 · Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.5: no exercise notice or amendment; do not extend expiry based on the option alone · Rent-Roll.xlsx row 7 expiry 2029-08-31
Calculation supplied
Authoritative expiry from executed lease; option unexercised so no extension
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
6,000
Expected
6,000
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.4: security deposit is $6,000 and is not prepaid rent or recurring income
Calculation supplied
As stated; excluded from income
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.5: one conditional renewal option requiring written notice at least 180 days before expiration; no exercise notice, landlord acknowledgment or amendment exercising the option is included · Rent-Roll.xlsx note row 21: no option exercise notice is included
Calculation supplied
No exercise evidence delivered; option treated as unexercised and expiry not extended
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
921,000
Expected
921,000
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2: GPR $780,000; combined revenue loss 5.00% of UW GPR; other income $180,000 added after loss · Workbook Underwriting!C8
Calculation supplied
780,000 x (1 - 0.05) = 741,000; + 180,000 = 921,000
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
36,840
Expected
36,840
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2: management fee = greater of T12 actual and 4.00% of underwritten EGI; T12 actual 18,000 · Workbook Underwriting!C15
Calculation supplied
max(18,000, 0.04 x 921,000 = 36,840) = 36,840
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
291,240
Expected
291,240
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 underwriting treatment table: taxes 120,000; insurance 34,800; utilities 21,600 (T12); R&M 36,000 (T12, $0 one-time removed); payroll 24,000 (T12); admin 18,000 (T12); management per test
Calculation supplied
120,000+34,800+21,600+36,000+24,000+18,000+36,840 = 291,240
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
629,760
Expected
629,760
Response evidence
Workbook Underwriting!C17 · Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
921,000 - 291,240 = 629,760
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
4,320
Expected
4,320
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2: replacement reserves $0.15 per rentable SF per year, deducted after NOI · Rent-Roll.xlsx: 28,800 total SF
Calculation supplied
0.15 x 28,800 = 4,320
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
625,440
Expected
625,440
Response evidence
Workbook Underwriting!C19
Calculation supplied
629,760 - 4,320 = 625,440
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
10,076,160
Expected
10,076,160
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 Valuation: UW NOI BEFORE reserves / 6.25% cap rate · Workbook Underwriting!C20
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 0.0625 = 10,076,160
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0635
Expected
0.0635
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 Contract rate: 6.35% fixed annual contractual rate
Calculation supplied
As stated
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0635
Expected
0.0635
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 Sizing rate: greater of current contractual rate and 6.35% underwriting floor
Calculation supplied
max(6.35% contract, 6.35% floor) = 6.35%
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.079904
Expected
0.079904
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1: 25 years, monthly payments; annual debt service = 12 monthly payments · Workbook 'Loan Sizing'!C5
Calculation supplied
12 x PMT(0.0635/12, 300, 1) = 0.07990371531 per $1 of principal
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,297,600
Expected
6,297,600
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 LTV 62.50% of indicative value · Workbook 'Loan Sizing'!C8
Calculation supplied
0.625 x 10,076,160 = 6,297,600
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
6,261,936.61
Expected
6,261,936.607627
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 DSCR: minimum 1.25x using NCF AFTER reserves / annual amortizing debt service at sizing rate · Workbook 'Loan Sizing'!C9
Calculation supplied
(625,440 / 1.25) / 0.07990371531 = 500,352 / 0.07990371531 = 6,261,936.61
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
6,997,333.33
Expected
6,997,333.333333
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 Debt yield: minimum 9.00%, numerator UW NOI BEFORE reserves · Workbook 'Loan Sizing'!C10
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 0.09 = 6,997,333.33
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
6,261,936.61
Expected
6,261,936.607627
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 Loan ceiling: lowest of LTV, DSCR and debt-yield constraints · Workbook 'Loan Sizing'!C12
Calculation supplied
min(6,297,600; 6,261,936.61; 6,997,333.33) = 6,261,936.61
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Workbook 'Loan Sizing'!C13
Calculation supplied
DSCR limit 6,261,937 < LTV 6,297,600 < debt yield 6,997,333
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
500,352
Expected
500,352
Response evidence
Workbook 'Loan Sizing'!C14 · Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 amortization convention
Calculation supplied
6,261,936.61 x 0.07990371531 = 500,352
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.25
Expected
1.25
Response evidence
Workbook 'Loan Sizing'!C15
Calculation supplied
625,440 NCF / 500,352 = 1.250x (binding at minimum)
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.1006
Expected
0.10057
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1: debt-yield numerator is UW NOI before reserves · Workbook 'Loan Sizing'!C16
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 6,261,936.61 = 0.100570 (10.06%)
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
500,352
Expected
500,352
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1: contract rate 6.35%; interest-only period 0 months · Workbook 'Loan Sizing'!C19
Calculation supplied
IO = 0 months, so 12 amortizing payments at 6.35% on 6,261,936.61 = 6,261,936.61 x 0.07990371531 = 500,352 (equal to sizing debt service because contract rate = sizing rate)
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
1,959,841.11
Expected
1,959,841.114766
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1: existing debt payoff $4,200,000; fixed closing costs $52,000 · Lender-Terms.pdf p.1: origination fee 0.80% of actual initial principal · Workbook 'Sources and Uses'!C12
Calculation supplied
6,261,936.61 - 4,200,000 - (0.008 x 6,261,936.61 = 50,095.49) - 52,000 = +1,959,841.11 (cash out)
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
585,552
Expected
585,552
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 sensitivity instruction: reduce total UW EGI by 5%, recompute management minimum, hold other expense and reserves constant · Workbook Sensitivity!D8
Calculation supplied
EGI 921,000 x 0.95 = 874,950; mgmt = max(18,000, 0.04 x 874,950 = 34,998) = 34,998; other opex 254,400; total opex 289,398; NOI = 874,950 - 289,398 = 585,552 (NCF 581,232)
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
5,313,426.59
Expected
5,313,426.592764
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2: combined downside also increases sizing rate by 100 bps; cap rate stays constant · Workbook Sensitivity!D18
Calculation supplied
Sizing rate 7.35%, constant = 12 x PMT(0.0735/12,300,1) = 0.08751143765. LTV = 0.625 x (585,552/0.0625 = 9,368,832) = 5,855,520; DSCR = (581,232/1.25)/0.08751143765 = 5,313,426.59; DY = 585,552/0.09 = 6,506,133. Minimum = 5,313,426.59 (DSCR binding)

GPT-5 agent · direct API control

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
10
Expected
10
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | Rent Roll!C7:C16 (units 101–110)
Calculation supplied
Count of listed suites (101–110) = 10
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
9
Expected
9
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | Rent Roll!F7:F16
Calculation supplied
Occupied rows in 101–109 = 9; 110 is Vacant
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
28,800
Expected
28,800
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | Rent Roll!E7:E16
Calculation supplied
Sum(E7:E16) = 1,400+1,800+2,200+2,500+3,000+3,300+3,800+4,200+5,000+1,600 = 28,800 SF
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
27,200
Expected
27,200
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | Rent Roll!E7:E15,E16
Calculation supplied
Total area 28,800 - Vacant (Suite 110) 1,600 = 27,200 SF
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
90
Expected
90
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | Rent Roll!C7:C16,F7:F16
Calculation supplied
9 occupied / 10 total * 100 = 90.00
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
94.4444
Expected
94.444444
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | Rent Roll!E7:E16,F7:F16
Calculation supplied
27,200 occupied SF / 28,800 total SF * 100 = 94.4444
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
60,000
Expected
60,000
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx | Rent Roll!G7:G15
Calculation supplied
Sum of monthly base rent for occupied suites (G7:G15) = 60,000
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
60,000
Expected
60,000
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §3 (Suite 101 $3,000/mo as of 2026-08-31; no increase before 2027-09-01) and Rent-Roll.xlsx G7:G15 (totals)
Calculation supplied
Contractual rent for 101 confirmed at $3,000; no other amendments provided; effective monthly base = printed rent roll total = 60,000
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
866,400
Expected
866,400
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (Annual totals)
Calculation supplied
EGI = Gross potential 759,600 - Vacancy 40,800 - Concessions 22,800 - Bad debt 6,000 + Other income 176,400 = 866,400
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
264,000
Expected
264,000
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (Annual totals)
Calculation supplied
Real estate taxes 114,000 + Insurance 32,400 + Utilities 21,600 + Repairs/Maint 36,000 + Payroll 24,000 + Admin/Legal 18,000 + Mgmt fee 18,000 = 264,000 (excludes reserves/capex/debt/depr.)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
602,400
Expected
602,400
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
T12 EGI 866,400 - T12 operating expenses 264,000 = 602,400
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
11,520
Expected
11,520
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (Replacement reserves Annual = 11,520)
Calculation supplied
As reported
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
590,880
Expected
590,880
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
T12 NOI before reserves 602,400 - T12 reserves 11,520 = 590,880
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
3,000
Expected
3,000
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §3
Calculation supplied
As stated: $3,000 per month as of 2026-08-31
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2029-08-31
Expected
2029-08-31
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §2
Calculation supplied
Initial term expires 2029-08-31; no exercised extension provided
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
6,000
Expected
6,000
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §4
Calculation supplied
As stated
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §5
Calculation supplied
Packet states no exercise notice or amendment included; do not extend expiry
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
921,000
Expected
921,000
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Underwriting plan)
Calculation supplied
Underwritten GPBR 780,000 - 5% loss (39,000) + Other income 180,000 = 921,000
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
36,840
Expected
36,840
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Mgmt fee = greater of T12 actual or 4% of underwritten EGI)
Calculation supplied
max(T12 actual 18,000, 4% * 921,000) = max(18,000, 36,840) = 36,840
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
291,240
Expected
291,240
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (expense directives)
Calculation supplied
Taxes 120,000 + Insurance 34,800 + Utilities 21,600 + Repairs 36,000 + Payroll 24,000 + Admin 18,000 + Mgmt 36,840 = 291,240
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
629,760
Expected
629,760
Response evidence
Derived from Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
UW EGI 921,000 - UW operating expenses 291,240 = 629,760
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
4,320
Expected
4,320
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Reserves $0.15 per rentable SF) and Rent-Roll.xlsx (total SF 28,800)
Calculation supplied
0.15 * 28,800 SF = 4,320
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
625,440
Expected
625,440
Response evidence
Derived from Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
UW NOI before reserves 629,760 - Reserves 4,320 = 625,440
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
10,076,160
Expected
10,076,160
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Value = NOI before reserves / 6.25% cap)
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 0.0625 = 10,076,160
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0635
Expected
0.0635
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Contract rate 6.35%)
Calculation supplied
As stated
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0635
Expected
0.0635
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Sizing rate = greater of current contractual and 6.35% floor)
Calculation supplied
max(6.35%, 6.35%) = 6.35% = 0.0635
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.079912
Expected
0.079904
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (25-year, monthly payments at sizing rate)
Calculation supplied
Monthly r = 0.0635/12; payment factor = r / (1 - (1+r)^-300) ≈ 0.0066593; annual constant = 12 * 0.0066593 ≈ 0.079912
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,297,600
Expected
6,297,600
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (LTV 62.5%)
Calculation supplied
62.5% * Value 10,076,160 = 6,297,600
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
6,261,405
Expected
6,261,936.607627
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (DSCR >= 1.25x on NCF using amortizing debt service)
Calculation supplied
Max annual DS = UW NCF 625,440 / 1.25 = 500,352; Max principal = 500,352 / 0.079912 ≈ 6,261,405
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
6,997,333.33
Expected
6,997,333.333333
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Debt yield min 9.00%; numerator NOI BEFORE reserves)
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 0.09 = 6,997,333.33
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
6,261,405
Expected
6,261,936.607627
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Loan ceiling = lowest of LTV, DSCR, Debt yield constraints)
Calculation supplied
min(LTV 6,297,600; DSCR 6,261,405; DY 6,997,333) = 6,261,405
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Comparison of calculated limits
Calculation supplied
DSCR limit (≈6.261M) is lowest vs LTV (≈6.298M) and Debt yield (≈7.0M)
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
500,352
Expected
500,352
Response evidence
Derived from sizing constant and maximum loan; Lender-Terms.pdf p.1
Calculation supplied
Annual DS = 6,261,405 * 0.079912 ≈ 500,352
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.25
Expected
1.25
Response evidence
Derived from UW NCF and sizing annual DS; Lender-Terms.pdf p.1
Calculation supplied
625,440 / 500,352 = 1.25
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.1006
Expected
0.10057
Response evidence
Derived from NOI before reserves and maximum loan; Lender-Terms.pdf p.1
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 6,261,405 ≈ 0.1006 (10.06%)
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
500,352
Expected
500,352
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Contract rate = sizing rate; IO period 0 months)
Calculation supplied
Same as sizing annual DS because contractual rate = 6.35% and no IO
cash_to_borrowerValue failed
Reported
1,959,313.76
Expected
1,959,841.114766
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (Existing payoff $4,200,000; Fixed closing costs $52,000). Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Origination fee 0.80%).
Calculation supplied
Net cash = Loan 6,261,405 - Payoff 4,200,000 - Orig fee (0.8%*6,261,405=50,091.24) - Closing 52,000 = 1,959,313.76
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
585,552
Expected
585,552
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Sensitivity instruction)
Calculation supplied
Stressed EGI = 0.95*921,000 = 874,950; Mgmt = 4%*874,950 = 34,998 (still > 18,000); Other op ex (excl. mgmt) = 254,400; Stressed NOI = 874,950 - (254,400+34,998) = 585,552 (before reserves)
stress_maximum_loanValue failed
Reported
5,312,000
Expected
5,313,426.592764
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Sensitivity) and Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (sizing rules)
Calculation supplied
Combined downside: EGI -5% (stressed NCF = (585,552 - 4,320)=581,232); sizing rate +100 bps => 7.35% (25yr). Annual constant ≈ 0.08754. DSCR limit = (581,232/1.25)/0.08754 ≈ 5.31M. LTV with stressed NOI: Value = 585,552/0.0625 = 9,368,832; LTV cap 62.5% = 5,855,520. Debt yield cap = 585,552/0.09 = 6,506,133. Binding ≈ DSCR ≈ 5.31M (rounded here to 5,312,000).

Opus 5 agent · direct API control

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
10
Expected
10
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, worksheet 'Rent Roll', rows 7-16 (units 101-110)
Calculation supplied
Count of listed units: 101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110 = 10
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
9
Expected
9
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' rows 7-15 Status='Occupied'; row 16 (unit 110) Status='Vacant'
Calculation supplied
10 total - 1 vacant (unit 110) = 9
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
28,800
Expected
28,800
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' column E, rows 7-16
Calculation supplied
1400+1800+2200+2500+3000+3300+3800+4200+5000+1600 = 28,800
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
27,200
Expected
27,200
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' column E, rows 7-15 (E16=1600 vacant)
Calculation supplied
28,800 - 1,600 = 27,200
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
90
Expected
90
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' rows 7-16, column F
Calculation supplied
9 / 10 x 100 = 90.00%
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
94.4444
Expected
94.444444
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' column E, rows 7-16
Calculation supplied
27,200 / 28,800 x 100 = 94.4444% (94.44%)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
60,000
Expected
60,000
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' column G, rows 7-15 (G16 blank = vacant, no contractual rent)
Calculation supplied
3000+4000+4900+5600+6500+7400+8600+9200+10800 = 60,000/month
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
60,000
Expected
60,000
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' G7:G15; Lease-File.pdf p.1 sec.3 ('Base rent is $3,000 per month as of August 31, 2026'), sec.6 (amendment authority)
Calculation supplied
Executed lease for premises 101 confirms $3,000/month, matching rent roll G7. No signed amendment, no exercised option, and no other authoritative amendment is in the packet, so no adjustment: 60,000/month unchanged. Annualized = $720,000.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
866,400
Expected
866,400
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, 'Annual' column: GPR 759,600; vacancy -40,800; concessions -22,800; bad debt -6,000; other income/recoveries 176,400 (Sep-2025-Aug-2026)
Calculation supplied
759,600 - 40,800 - 22,800 - 6,000 + 176,400 = 866,400
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
264,000
Expected
264,000
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 'Annual' column: taxes 114,000; insurance 32,400; utilities 21,600; R&M 36,000; payroll 24,000; admin/legal 18,000; management 18,000. Reserves 11,520, capex 74,000, P&I 294,000 and depreciation 180,000 excluded per p.1/p.2 footnote and Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1
Calculation supplied
114,000+32,400+21,600+36,000+24,000+18,000+18,000 = 264,000
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
602,400
Expected
602,400
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2 'Annual' column (no subtotal is printed in the statement)
Calculation supplied
866,400 EGI - 264,000 operating expenses = 602,400
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
11,520
Expected
11,520
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, 'Replacement reserves (below NOI)', Annual = 11,520
Calculation supplied
As reported; equals ~$0.40/SF on 28,800 SF
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
590,880
Expected
590,880
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2 Annual column
Calculation supplied
602,400 - 11,520 = 590,880
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
3,000
Expected
3,000
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 sec.3 ('Base rent is $3,000 per month as of August 31, 2026'; no increase before 2027-09-01); corroborated by Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' G7=3000
Calculation supplied
Executed lease and rent roll agree; no signed amendment in packet
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2029-08-31
Expected
2029-08-31
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 sec.2 ('The initial term expires 2029-08-31'); Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' I7='2029-08-31'
Calculation supplied
Renewal option not evidenced as exercised (Lease-File.pdf sec.5), so current expiry is not extended
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
6,000
Expected
6,000
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 sec.4 ('The security deposit is $6,000 and is not prepaid rent or recurring income')
Calculation supplied
Not included in EGI or NOI
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 sec.5 ('No exercise notice, landlord acknowledgment or amendment exercising this option is included in the packet'); Rent-Roll.xlsx 'Rent Roll' C21
Calculation supplied
No exercise evidence in delivered materials; option is conditional (no uncured default + written notice >=180 days before expiration). Expiry remains 2029-08-31.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
921,000
Expected
921,000
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2: GPR $780,000; combined revenue loss 5.00% of underwritten GPR; other income/recoveries $180,000 added after revenue loss
Calculation supplied
780,000 x (1 - 0.05) = 741,000; 741,000 + 180,000 = 921,000
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
36,840
Expected
36,840
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 ('Greater of T12 actual and 4.00% of underwritten EGI'); T12-Statement.pdf p.2 management fee Annual 18,000
Calculation supplied
max(18,000 T12 actual, 0.04 x 921,000 = 36,840) = 36,840
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
291,240
Expected
291,240
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 expense table: taxes 120,000; insurance 34,800; utilities 21,600 (T12); R&M 36,000 (T12, $0 one-time removal); payroll 24,000 (T12); admin/legal 18,000 (T12); management 36,840
Calculation supplied
120,000+34,800+21,600+36,000+24,000+18,000+36,840 = 291,240 (31.62% of EGI)
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
629,760
Expected
629,760
Response evidence
Derived from Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 plan inputs
Calculation supplied
921,000 - 291,240 = 629,760
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
4,320
Expected
4,320
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 ('$0.15 per rentable SF per year; deduct after NOI'); Rent-Roll.xlsx total area 28,800 SF
Calculation supplied
0.15 x 28,800 = 4,320
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
625,440
Expected
625,440
Response evidence
Derived from Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
629,760 - 4,320 = 625,440
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
10,076,160
Expected
10,076,160
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Valuation': underwritten NOI BEFORE reserves / 6.25% cap rate; no appraisal implied
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 0.0625 = 10,076,160 (indicative only)
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0635
Expected
0.0635
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Contract rate' = 6.35% fixed annual
Calculation supplied
6.35% / 100 = 0.0635
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0635
Expected
0.0635
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Sizing rate' = greater of current contractual rate and 6.35% underwriting floor
Calculation supplied
max(0.0635 contract, 0.0635 floor) = 0.0635
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.079904
Expected
0.079904
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1: 25-year amortization, monthly payments, annual DS = 12 monthly payments; sizing rate 6.35%
Calculation supplied
i = 0.0635/12 = 0.00529166667; n = 300; monthly factor = i / (1 - (1+i)^-300) = 0.00529166667 / (1 - 0.20529352) = 0.00665864; annual constant = 12 x 0.00665864 = 0.0799037 (0.07990372)
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,297,600
Expected
6,297,600
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'LTV' = 62.50% of indicative value
Calculation supplied
0.6250 x 10,076,160 = 6,297,600
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
6,261,937
Expected
6,261,936.607627
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'DSCR' minimum 1.25x, NCF after reserves / annual amortizing debt service at sizing rate; IO period 0 months
Calculation supplied
Max annual DS = 625,440 / 1.25 = 500,352; loan = 500,352 / 0.07990372 = 6,261,937 (unrounded 6,261,937.4)
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
6,997,333
Expected
6,997,333.333333
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Debt yield' minimum 9.00%, numerator = underwritten NOI BEFORE reserves
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 0.0900 = 6,997,333 (unrounded 6,997,333.33)
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
6,261,937
Expected
6,261,936.607627
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Loan ceiling' = lowest of LTV, DSCR and debt-yield constraints; no separate dollar cap
Calculation supplied
min(6,297,600 LTV; 6,261,937 DSCR; 6,997,333 DY) = 6,261,937
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Comparison of the three Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 constraints
Calculation supplied
DSCR 6,261,937 < LTV 6,297,600 (headroom ~$35,663) < DY 6,997,333
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
500,352
Expected
500,352
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (25-yr monthly amortization at sizing rate; annual DS = 12 monthly payments)
Calculation supplied
6,261,937 x 0.07990372 = 500,352 (monthly payment approx. 41,696)
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.25
Expected
1.25
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 DSCR definition (NCF after reserves)
Calculation supplied
625,440 / 500,352 = 1.2500 (binding at the 1.25x minimum)
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.1006
Expected
0.10057
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 debt-yield numerator = underwritten NOI BEFORE reserves
Calculation supplied
629,760 / 6,261,937 = 0.100570 (10.06%; above the 9.00% minimum)
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
500,352
Expected
500,352
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1: contract rate 6.35%, interest-only period 0 months, 25-yr monthly amortization
Calculation supplied
IO = 0, so year 1 is fully amortizing at the contract rate; contract rate equals the sizing rate, so the constant is identical: 6,261,937 x 0.07990372 = 500,352. Actual first-year DS = sizing DS (variance $0).
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
1,959,842
Expected
1,959,841.114766
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1: existing debt payoff $4,200,000; fixed closing costs $52,000. Lender-Terms.pdf p.1: origination fee 0.80% of actual initial principal; no fee capitalization/interest reserve/holdback
Calculation supplied
6,261,937 - 4,200,000 - (0.008 x 6,261,937 = 50,095) - 52,000 = 1,959,842 (positive = cash out to borrower)
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
585,552
Expected
585,552
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 sensitivity instruction: reduce total underwritten EGI by 5%, recompute management minimum, hold all other operating expense and reserve assumptions constant
Calculation supplied
Stressed EGI = 921,000 x 0.95 = 874,950; management = max(18,000, 0.04 x 874,950 = 34,998) = 34,998; other opex = 291,240 - 36,840 = 254,400; total opex = 289,398; NOI before reserves = 874,950 - 289,398 = 585,552 (stress NCF = 585,552 - 4,320 = 581,232)
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
5,313,428
Expected
5,313,426.592764
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (combined downside: EGI -5% and sizing rate +100 bps, cap rate constant); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 constraint definitions
Calculation supplied
Stress sizing rate = 0.0735; i = 0.006125, n = 300; monthly factor = 0.006125 / (1 - 0.16010979) = 0.00729262; annual constant = 0.0875114. Value = 585,552 / 0.0625 = 9,368,832 -> LTV limit = 0.625 x 9,368,832 = 5,855,520. DSCR: 581,232 / 1.25 = 464,985.60; / 0.0875114 = 5,313,428. DY: 585,552 / 0.09 = 6,506,133. min = 5,313,428 (DSCR binding); decline vs base = -948,509 (-15.1%). Stress cash to borrower = 5,313,428 - 4,200,000 - 42,507 - 52,000 = 1,018,921.

Back to the complete comparison