Workflow v1 / 30 completed workflows

Juniper Flats

Inspect the source packet, compare each system’s work, and read the exact findings behind the score.

The five original source files

Lev Agent

All 39 headline source and financial checks passed.

All 39 requested fields pass and financial formulas recalculate correctly. The memo reverses positive downside cash into cash-in, misstates actual LTV and understates lease rollover. Several tables overflow; three workbook explanation cells are invalid formulas.

Material claims to inspect

PDF p.5 downside narrative — The stressed loan is below payoff plus fees and requires $1,431,464 cash in.

Source-supported finding: 4,812,558.614707205 × (1 − .0075) − 3,300,000 − 45,000 = +1,431,464.425096902 cash out.

Reverses the financing cash-flow sign.

PDF p.5 rollover risk — Twelve leases roll in the first twelve months.

Source-supported finding: All 33 occupied source rows have expiries between 2026-09-30 and 2027-08-31.

Understates the near-term renewal exposure by 21 leases.

All review findings (1)
  • Workbook errors: Underwriting!C6, Reported_Fields!D8 and D9 are explanation text stored as formulas. Main numerical calculations and all three input perturbations pass.
Every artifact acceptance check (15/20)
Work productCheckOutcomeEvidence
Memo1PassA real PDF was downloaded and all pages rendered with readable main content.
Original PDF and full-page render review
Memo2PassThe memo identifies the named property, August 31, 2026 as-of date and first-mortgage refinance purpose.
PDF opening title, property table and recommendation
Memo3PassBase loan, existing payoff, loan-based fee, fixed closing costs and net borrower cash reconcile to the supplied scenario.
PDF sources/uses and independently checked key
Memo4PassHistorical T12 and forward underwriting are labeled separately, with NOI before reserves and NCF after reserves.
PDF historical and underwriting tables; original T12 and plan
Memo5FailOpening recommendation gives actual LTV as 65.0%; 65% is the ceiling. At the stated loan and value, actual LTV is 61.03%.
PDF p.1: LTV clears at 65.0% of indicative value against a 65% cap.
Memo6FailThe memo says twelve leases roll in the first twelve months. All 33 occupied leases expire by August 31, 2027.
PDF p.5 Near-term rollover; source Rent Roll!I7:I42, excluding vacant rows.
Memo7FailThe downside narrative calls a positive cash-out amount a cash-in requirement.
PDF p.5: loan becomes a cash-in refinance, approximately $-1,431,464 of borrower equity required.
Memo8PassThe supplied forecast, lender conventions and any provisional items are labeled as assumptions.
PDF assumptions and limitations; Property-and-Plan.pdf
Memo9PassThe memorandum identifies the five source files and their relevant content.
PDF source references and source pointers in the analysis
Memo10FailTable notes overflow their columns and page width, and page 2 contains one orphaned cash-out row.
Rendered PDF pp.1–3; historical-versus-underwritten table notes extend past the right edge.
Workbook1PassXLSX opens
Workbook2PassInputs, units, date and source references are identifiable.
Delivered input/instruction/source sheets; non-formula cell inspection
Workbook3PassHistorical and forward cash flows are separate and their totals reconcile.
Recalculated historical sheet totals and original T12; independently tested underwriting outputs
Workbook4Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":545960,"expected":545960,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":535160,"expected":535160,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5794435.06022346,"expected":5794435.060223457,"passed":true}]
Workbook5Pass{"uw_noi_before_reserves":true,"uw_ncf":true,"maximum_loan":true,"capitalization_value":true,"dscr_limit":true}
Workbook6Pass[{"field":"capitalization_value","actual":8735360,"expected":8735360,"passed":true},{"field":"ltv_limit","actual":5677984,"expected":5677984,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5677984,"expected":5677984,"passed":true}]
Workbook7Pass[{"field":"dscr_limit","actual":5229928.74076399,"expected":5229928.740763942,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5229928.74076399,"expected":5229928.740763942,"passed":true}]
Workbook8Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":503252,"expected":503252,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":492452,"expected":492452,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5332014.97547866,"expected":5332014.975478739,"passed":true}]
Workbook9Fail{"formula_errors":["Underwriting!C6: #VALUE!","Reported_Fields!D8: #VALUE!","Reported_Fields!D9: #VALUE!"],"external_links_or_macros":[]}
Workbook10PassMain underwriting labels and numbers are visible and a reviewer can locate assumptions and decision outputs.
Main underwriting sheet rendered at 1.3 scale; input and sizing cells inspected

Inference: $2.473. PostHog trace estimate using OpenRouter model rates; charged generation events summed, duplicate run-summary excluded

Read the analysis, checks and execution record

GPT-5 agent

All 39 headline source and financial checks passed.

All 39 requested fields and workbook arithmetic checks pass. Workbook source references are missing. The memo incorrectly leaves stressed LTV capacity unchanged when stressed NOI falls.

Material claims to inspect

PDF p.3 downside paragraph — Stress LTV limit is unchanged at $6,171,722.

Source-supported finding: 503,252 / .0575 × .65 = 5,688,935.652173913.

Overstates the stressed LTV limit by about $482,786, although DSCR remains the minimum.

All review findings (2)
  • Stress maximum loan remains correctly DSCR-bound at $4,812,559; the separate incorrect LTV claim is not hidden by that correct maximum.
  • Four-page PDF has some missing hyphen glyphs and empty table headers, but the content is legible.
Every artifact acceptance check (18/20)
Work productCheckOutcomeEvidence
Memo1PassA real PDF was downloaded and all pages rendered with readable main content.
Original PDF and full-page render review
Memo2PassThe memo identifies the named property, August 31, 2026 as-of date and first-mortgage refinance purpose.
PDF opening title, property table and recommendation
Memo3PassBase loan, existing payoff, loan-based fee, fixed closing costs and net borrower cash reconcile to the supplied scenario.
PDF sources/uses and independently checked key
Memo4PassHistorical T12 and forward underwriting are labeled separately, with NOI before reserves and NCF after reserves.
PDF historical and underwriting tables; original T12 and plan
Memo5PassLoan constraints, binding minimum and debt-service/coverage figures follow the lender terms.
PDF financing/sizing section; Lender-Terms.pdf
Memo6PassOccupancy and the subject lease are discussed against the supplied rent roll and controlling executed document.
PDF property/lease discussion; Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf
Memo7FailThe downside discussion holds LTV capacity at its base value although income and capitalized value decline.
PDF p.3: LTV limit unchanged at $6,171,722 (cap unchanged at 5.75%). Correct stress LTV is $5,688,935.65.
Memo8PassThe supplied forecast, lender conventions and any provisional items are labeled as assumptions.
PDF assumptions and limitations; Property-and-Plan.pdf
Memo9PassThe memorandum identifies the five source files and their relevant content.
PDF source references and source pointers in the analysis
Memo10PassRendered headings, tables and financial values are readable with no materially clipped content.
Full-page PDF rendering inspection
Workbook1PassXLSX opens
Workbook2FailThe delivered workbook has dates and labeled inputs but no source-file or source-location references.
Complete non-formula cell inspection: no PDF/XLSX source citations.
Workbook3PassHistorical and forward cash flows are separate and their totals reconcile.
Recalculated historical sheet totals and original T12; independently tested underwriting outputs
Workbook4Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":545960,"expected":545960,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":535160,"expected":535160,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5794435.06022348,"expected":5794435.060223457,"passed":true}]
Workbook5Pass{"uw_noi_before_reserves":true,"uw_ncf":true,"maximum_loan":true,"capitalization_value":true,"dscr_limit":true}
Workbook6Pass[{"field":"capitalization_value","actual":8735360,"expected":8735360,"passed":true},{"field":"ltv_limit","actual":5677984,"expected":5677984,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5677984,"expected":5677984,"passed":true}]
Workbook7Pass[{"field":"dscr_limit","actual":5229928.74076398,"expected":5229928.740763942,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5229928.74076398,"expected":5229928.740763942,"passed":true}]
Workbook8Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":503252,"expected":503252,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":492452,"expected":492452,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5332014.97547869,"expected":5332014.975478739,"passed":true}]
Workbook9Pass{"formula_errors":[],"external_links_or_macros":[]}
Workbook10PassMain underwriting labels and numbers are visible and a reviewer can locate assumptions and decision outputs.
Main underwriting sheet rendered at 1.3 scale; input and sizing cells inspected

Inference: $0.289. Gateway usage.cost; all attempts included; absent usage remains unknown

Read the analysis, checks and execution record

Opus 5 agent

All 39 headline source and financial checks passed.

All 39 headline fields and all workbook acceptance checks pass. The memo correctly keeps downside cash positive and identifies the actual LTV; its additional full-occupancy rent bridge overstates vacant-unit asking rent.

All review findings (2)
  • The main $62,275 occupied monthly-rent calculation and all requested fields are correct. The error is in the extra memo bridge, retained separately.
  • Seven-page PDF is readable and consistently labels periods, assumptions and references.
Every artifact acceptance check (19/20)
Work productCheckOutcomeEvidence
Memo1PassA real PDF was downloaded and all pages rendered with readable main content.
Original PDF and full-page render review
Memo2PassThe memo identifies the named property, August 31, 2026 as-of date and first-mortgage refinance purpose.
PDF opening title, property table and recommendation
Memo3PassBase loan, existing payoff, loan-based fee, fixed closing costs and net borrower cash reconcile to the supplied scenario.
PDF sources/uses and independently checked key
Memo4PassHistorical T12 and forward underwriting are labeled separately, with NOI before reserves and NCF after reserves.
PDF historical and underwriting tables; original T12 and plan
Memo5PassLoan constraints, binding minimum and debt-service/coverage figures follow the lender terms.
PDF financing/sizing section; Lender-Terms.pdf
Memo6FailThe additional rent bridge uses $6,700 monthly asking rent for the three vacant units; the supplied roll totals $6,025.
PDF p.6: three vacant units at asking rents ($6,700 per month), full-occupancy rent $827,700. Source H15=$1,675, H31=$2,175, H42=$2,175: full occupancy is $819,600.
Memo7PassSensitivity, missing diligence and financing risks are disclosed without unsupported numerical conclusions.
PDF sensitivity and risk/limitations sections
Memo8PassThe supplied forecast, lender conventions and any provisional items are labeled as assumptions.
PDF assumptions and limitations; Property-and-Plan.pdf
Memo9PassThe memorandum identifies the five source files and their relevant content.
PDF source references and source pointers in the analysis
Memo10PassRendered headings, tables and financial values are readable with no materially clipped content.
Full-page PDF rendering inspection
Workbook1PassXLSX opens
Workbook2PassInputs, units, date and source references are identifiable.
Delivered input/instruction/source sheets; non-formula cell inspection
Workbook3PassHistorical and forward cash flows are separate and their totals reconcile.
Recalculated historical sheet totals and original T12; independently tested underwriting outputs
Workbook4Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":545960,"expected":545960,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":535160,"expected":535160,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5794435.06022348,"expected":5794435.060223457,"passed":true}]
Workbook5Pass{"uw_noi_before_reserves":true,"uw_ncf":true,"maximum_loan":true,"capitalization_value":true,"dscr_limit":true}
Workbook6Pass[{"field":"capitalization_value","actual":8735360,"expected":8735360,"passed":true},{"field":"ltv_limit","actual":5677984,"expected":5677984,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5677984,"expected":5677984,"passed":true}]
Workbook7Pass[{"field":"dscr_limit","actual":5229928.74076398,"expected":5229928.740763942,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5229928.74076398,"expected":5229928.740763942,"passed":true}]
Workbook8Pass[{"field":"uw_noi_before_reserves","actual":503252,"expected":503252,"passed":true},{"field":"uw_ncf","actual":492452,"expected":492452,"passed":true},{"field":"maximum_loan","actual":5332014.97547869,"expected":5332014.975478739,"passed":true}]
Workbook9Pass{"formula_errors":[],"external_links_or_macros":[]}
Workbook10PassMain underwriting labels and numbers are visible and a reviewer can locate assumptions and decision outputs.
Main underwriting sheet rendered at 1.3 scale; input and sizing cells inspected

Inference: $4.750. Gateway usage.cost; all attempts included; absent usage remains unknown

Read the analysis, checks and execution record

Inspect every reported value

The same 39 source and financial checks apply to every system. Open a row to see the response citation and review rationale. Direct controls are labeled separately.

Lev Agent

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
36
Expected
36
Response evidence
Units 101–120 (20 × 750 SF) + 121–136 (16 × 1,050 SF)
Review
The heading ends its range one row early (41 instead of 42), but the answer explicitly identifies the complete unit records 101–136 and all three vacant units, including 136. These named source records and scoped calculations support the value; the address typo is retained.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
33
Expected
33
Response evidence
Vacants: 109, 125, 136
Review
The heading ends its range one row early (41 instead of 42), but the answer explicitly identifies the complete unit records 101–136 and all three vacant units, including 136. These named source records and scoped calculations support the value; the address typo is retained.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
31,800
Expected
31,800
Response evidence
20×750 + 16×1,050
Review
The heading ends its range one row early (41 instead of 42), but the answer explicitly identifies the complete unit records 101–136 and all three vacant units, including 136. These named source records and scoped calculations support the value; the address typo is retained.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
28,950
Expected
28,950
Response evidence
19×750 + 14×1,050
Review
The heading ends its range one row early (41 instead of 42), but the answer explicitly identifies the complete unit records 101–136 and all three vacant units, including 136. These named source records and scoped calculations support the value; the address typo is retained.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
91.67
Expected
91.666667
Response evidence
33 / 36 × 100
Review
The heading ends its range one row early (41 instead of 42), but the answer explicitly identifies the complete unit records 101–136 and all three vacant units, including 136. These named source records and scoped calculations support the value; the address typo is retained.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
91.04
Expected
91.037736
Response evidence
28,950 / 31,800 × 100
Review
The heading ends its range one row early (41 instead of 42), but the answer explicitly identifies the complete unit records 101–136 and all three vacant units, including 136. These named source records and scoped calculations support the value; the address typo is retained.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
$62,275
Expected
62,275
Response evidence
SUM occupied contractual = 19×$1,675 + 14×$2,175
Review
The heading ends its range one row early (41 instead of 42), but the answer explicitly identifies the complete unit records 101–136 and all three vacant units, including 136. These named source records and scoped calculations support the value; the address typo is retained.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
$62,275
Expected
62,275
Response evidence
Lease-File §3 unit 101 rent $1,675 matches rent roll; no authoritative amendment supersedes
Review
The heading ends its range one row early (41 instead of 42), but the answer explicitly identifies the complete unit records 101–136 and all three vacant units, including 136. These named source records and scoped calculations support the value; the address typo is retained.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
$821,100
Expected
821,100
Response evidence
840,000 − 42,000 − 12,000 − 4,500 + 39,600
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
$307,800
Expected
307,800
Response evidence
108,000 + 31,200 + 28,800 + 46,200 + 42,000 + 21,600 + 30,000
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
$513,300
Expected
513,300
Response evidence
EGI − OpEx
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
$10,800
Expected
10,800
Response evidence
Replacement reserves annual (below NOI)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
$502,500
Expected
502,500
Response evidence
NOI − reserves
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
$1,675
Expected
1,675
Response evidence
Lease-File §3
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2027-07-31
Expected
2027-07-31
Response evidence
Lease-File §2
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
$1,675
Expected
1,675
Response evidence
Lease-File §4
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File §5; Rent-Roll footer
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
Scoped response context
Rent roll (Rent-Roll.xlsx — Rent Roll sheet, rows 7–41)
T12 (T12-Statement.pdf p.1–2, Annual column)
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
$854,160
Expected
854,160
Response evidence
864,000 − 6% × 864,000 + 42,000
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
$30,000
Expected
30,000
Response evidence
MAX(T12 $30,000; 3% × UW EGI $25,624.80) — floor binds
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
$308,200
Expected
308,200
Response evidence
112,000 + 33,600 + 28,800 + 40,200* + 42,000 + 21,600 + 30,000
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
$545,960
Expected
545,960
Response evidence
UW EGI − UW OpEx
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
$10,800
Expected
10,800
Response evidence
$300 × 36 units
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
$535,160
Expected
535,160
Response evidence
UW NOI − reserves
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
$9,494,956.52
Expected
9,494,956.521739
Response evidence
$545,960 / 5.75% (UW NOI before reserves)
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
5.9000%
Expected
0.059
Response evidence
Lender-Terms
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
6.2500%
Expected
0.0625
Response evidence
MAX(5.90%, 6.25% floor)
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.07388606
Expected
0.073886
Response evidence
30-yr amort, monthly, at 6.25%
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
$6,171,721.74
Expected
6,171,721.73913
Response evidence
65% × value
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
$5,794,435.06
Expected
5,794,435.060223
Response evidence
$535,160 / 1.25 / 0.07388606
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
$6,296,000.00
Expected
6,296,000
Response evidence
$535,160 / 8.50%
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
$5,794,435.06
Expected
5,794,435.060223
Response evidence
MIN of three
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
$428,128.00
Expected
428,128
Response evidence
Max loan × ADC
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.2500x
Expected
1.25
Response evidence
NCF / Sizing ADS
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
9.24%
Expected
0.092358
Response evidence
NCF / Max loan
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
$341,871.67
Expected
341,871.668553
Response evidence
Loan × 5.90% (year 1 within 24-mo IO — interest only)
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
$2,405,976.80
Expected
2,405,976.797272
Response evidence
5,794,435.06 − 3,300,000 − 0.75% × loan ($43,458.26) − $45,000
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
$503,252
Expected
503,252
Response evidence
No inline location supplied
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
$4,812,558.61
Expected
4,812,558.614707
Response evidence
No inline location supplied

GPT-5 agent

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
36
Expected
36
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll!C7:C42 units; count incl. two vacants
Calculation supplied
20 one-bed units + 16 two-bed units = 36 units (rows 7–42; three vacancies do not change count)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
33
Expected
33
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll!F7:F42 statuses; vacancies at rows 15, 31, 42
Calculation supplied
36 total - 3 vacant = 33 occupied
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
31,800
Expected
31,800
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll!E7:E42 areas; 20 @ 750 SF and 16 @ 1,050 SF
Calculation supplied
20*750 + 16*1050 = 31,800 SF
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
28,950
Expected
28,950
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll!E7:E42 with three vacants at rows 15,31,42
Calculation supplied
31,800 total - (750+1,050+1,050) vacant = 28,950 SF
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
91.6667
Expected
91.666667
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll counts as above
Calculation supplied
33 / 36 = 0.916667 = 91.6667%
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
91.0377
Expected
91.037736
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll areas as above
Calculation supplied
28,950 / 31,800 = 0.910377 = 91.0377%
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
62,275
Expected
62,275
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll!G7:G42 base rents; vacant units blank
Calculation supplied
19 one-bed occupied x $1,675 + 14 two-bed occupied x $2,175 = $31,825 + $30,450 = $62,275/month
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
62,275
Expected
62,275
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p1; confirms 101 rent $1,675/mo; no amendments
Calculation supplied
No lease amendments changing base rent; printed rent stands = $62,275/month
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
821,100
Expected
821,100
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p2 Annual column
Calculation supplied
GPR $840,000 - losses $58,500 + other $39,600 = $821,100
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
307,800
Expected
307,800
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p2 Annual column; specified expenses before reserves
Calculation supplied
Sum of taxes 108,000 + insurance 31,200 + utilities 28,800 + R&M 46,200 + payroll 42,000 + admin 21,600 + mgmt 30,000 = $307,800
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
513,300
Expected
513,300
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p2 Annual column
Calculation supplied
EGI 821,100 - operating expenses 307,800 = $513,300
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
10,800
Expected
10,800
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p2 Annual column 'Replacement reserves'
Calculation supplied
Given
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
502,500
Expected
502,500
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p2 Annual column; NCF after reserves
Calculation supplied
NOI 513,300 - reserves 10,800 = $502,500
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,675
Expected
1,675
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p1; Premises 101 Base rent $1,675/mo
Calculation supplied
Given by executed lease extract
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2027-07-31
Expected
2027-07-31
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p1; Term expiry
Calculation supplied
Given by executed lease extract
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,675
Expected
1,675
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p1; Security deposit $1,675
Calculation supplied
Given by executed lease extract
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p1 Section 5 notes no exercise evidence included
Calculation supplied
Packet lacks any option exercise notice or amendment; treat as not exercised
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
854,160
Expected
854,160
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p2 underwriting plan
Calculation supplied
$864,000 GPR * (1-6%) + $42,000 other = $854,160
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
30,000
Expected
30,000
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p2 management fee rule; T12-Statement.pdf p2 T12 mgmt $30,000
Calculation supplied
Max(T12 actual $30,000, 3% of UW EGI $25,624.80) = $30,000
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
308,200
Expected
308,200
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p2 opex line items and insurance renewal $33,600
Calculation supplied
Taxes 112,000 + Insurance 33,600 + Utilities 28,800 + R&M adj 40,200 + Payroll 42,000 + Admin 21,600 + Mgmt 30,000 = $308,200
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
545,960
Expected
545,960
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p2 EGI and opex treatment
Calculation supplied
UW EGI 854,160 - UW opex 308,200 = $545,960
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
10,800
Expected
10,800
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p2 reserves $300/unit; Rent-Roll.xlsx unit count 36
Calculation supplied
$300 * 36 units = $10,800
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
535,160
Expected
535,160
Response evidence
Derived from UW NOI and reserves above
Calculation supplied
545,960 - 10,800 = $535,160
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
9,494,956.521739
Expected
9,494,956.521739
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1 valuation method 5.75% cap; UW NOI above
Calculation supplied
UW NOI $545,960 / 0.0575 = $9,494,956.52
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.059
Expected
0.059
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1
Calculation supplied
Given contractual rate 5.90% fixed
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0625
Expected
0.0625
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1 'greater of current rate and 6.25% floor'
Calculation supplied
Max(5.90%, 6.25%) = 6.25%
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.073886
Expected
0.073886
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1; 30-year amort monthly, 6.25% sizing rate
Calculation supplied
ABS(12*PMT(0.0625/12,360,1)) = 0.0738860641
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,171,721.73913
Expected
6,171,721.73913
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1 65%; capitalization value above
Calculation supplied
65% * $9,494,956.52 = $6,171,721.74
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
5,794,435.060223
Expected
5,794,435.060223
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1 DSCR 1.25x using NCF and amort DS at sizing rate
Calculation supplied
UW NCF $535,160 / (0.0738860641 * 1.25) = $5,794,435.06
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
6,296,000
Expected
6,296,000
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1 DY 8.50% numerator NCF
Calculation supplied
UW NCF $535,160 / 0.085 = $6,296,000
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
5,794,435.060223
Expected
5,794,435.060223
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1 min of constraints; see above limits
Calculation supplied
Min($6,171,722; $5,794,435; $6,296,000) = $5,794,435.06
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1; computed limits
Calculation supplied
DSCR limit is the lowest of the three
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
428,128
Expected
428,128
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1 amort sizing
Calculation supplied
Max loan $5,794,435.06 * debt constant 0.0738860641 = $428,128
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.25
Expected
1.25
Response evidence
Definition uses UW NCF and sizing annual DS
Calculation supplied
$535,160 / $428,128 = 1.25x
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.092358
Expected
0.092358
Response evidence
Definition uses UW NCF / loan
Calculation supplied
$535,160 / $5,794,435.06 = 9.2358%
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
341,871.668553
Expected
341,871.668553
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p1 contract rate 5.90% IO 24 months
Calculation supplied
Interest-only year one: 5.90% * max loan $5,794,435.06 = $341,871.67
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
2,405,976.797272
Expected
2,405,976.797272
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p1 payoff $3.30mm and fixed costs $45k; Lender-Terms.pdf p1 0.75% fee
Calculation supplied
Loan $5,794,435.06 - orig fee (0.75%) - $45,000 - $3,300,000 = $2,405,976.80
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
503,252
Expected
503,252
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p2 sensitivity instruction
Calculation supplied
EGI down 5% to $811,452; mgmt = max($30,000, 3%*$811,452=$24,344)=$30,000; other opex unchanged 278,200; NOI = 811,452 - (278,200+30,000) = $503,252
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
4,812,558.614707
Expected
4,812,558.614707
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p2 combo downside; Lender-Terms.pdf p1 sizing rules
Calculation supplied
Stress EGI 5% lower; stress NCF $492,452; sizing rate +100 bps to 7.25% => debt constant 8.1861%; DSCR limit = $492,452/(0.081861*1.25) = $4,812,559; LTV limit unchanged $6,171,722; DY limit $492,452/0.085=$5,793,553; minimum is $4,812,559

Opus 5 agent

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
36
Expected
36
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, 'Rent Roll' rows 7-42 (units 101-136)
Calculation supplied
20 one-bedroom units (101-120) + 16 two-bedroom units (121-136) = 36
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
33
Expected
33
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7-42, Status column F; vacant at rows 15 (unit 109), 31 (125), 42 (136)
Calculation supplied
36 total - 3 vacant = 33
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
31,800
Expected
31,800
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column E rows 7-42
Calculation supplied
20 x 750 + 16 x 1,050 = 15,000 + 16,800 = 31,800
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
28,950
Expected
28,950
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx columns E/F rows 7-42
Calculation supplied
19 x 750 + 14 x 1,050 = 14,250 + 14,700 = 28,950
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
91.67
Expected
91.666667
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7-42
Calculation supplied
33 / 36 x 100 = 91.6667
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
91.04
Expected
91.037736
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7-42
Calculation supplied
28,950 / 31,800 x 100 = 91.0377
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
62,275
Expected
62,275
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column G rows 7-42; note C45 (vacant premises have no contractual rent)
Calculation supplied
19 x 1,675 + 14 x 2,175 = 31,825 + 30,450 = 62,275
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
62,275
Expected
62,275
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column G rows 7-42 · Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.3 (unit 101 base rent $1,675 as of 2026-08-31); s.6 amendment authority
Calculation supplied
No executed amendment alters any rent; the executed lease for unit 101 confirms $1,675, matching the rent roll, so effective = printed = 62,275
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
821,100
Expected
821,100
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf pp.1-2, Annual column
Calculation supplied
840,000 - 42,000 - 12,000 - 4,500 + 39,600 = 821,100
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
307,800
Expected
307,800
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf pp.1-2, Annual column · Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (debt, capital improvements and depreciation are not operating expenses)
Calculation supplied
108,000 + 31,200 + 28,800 + 46,200 + 42,000 + 21,600 + 30,000 = 307,800 (excludes reserves 10,800, capex 62,000, P&I 294,000, depreciation 180,000)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
513,300
Expected
513,300
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf pp.1-2, Annual column
Calculation supplied
821,100 - 307,800 = 513,300
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
10,800
Expected
10,800
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf pp.1-2, 'Replacement reserves (below NOI)' Annual 10,800
Calculation supplied
As reported in the T12 annual column
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
502,500
Expected
502,500
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf pp.1-2
Calculation supplied
513,300 - 10,800 = 502,500
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,675
Expected
1,675
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.3 ('Base rent is $1,675 per month as of August 31, 2026') · Rent-Roll.xlsx row 7 (G7 = 1675)
Calculation supplied
Executed lease and rent roll agree; no amendment is included in the packet
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2027-07-31
Expected
2027-07-31
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.2 ('The initial term expires 2027-07-31') · Rent-Roll.xlsx I7 = '2027-07-31'
Calculation supplied
Not extended: the renewal option requires timely written notice and none is delivered (Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.5)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,675
Expected
1,675
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.4 ('The security deposit is $1,675 and is not prepaid rent or recurring income')
Calculation supplied
Stated; excluded from income
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.5 ('No exercise notice, landlord acknowledgment or amendment exercising this option is included in the packet. Do not extend the current expiry based on the existence of the option alone.') · Rent-Roll.xlsx C47 ('no option exercise notice is included')
Calculation supplied
No delivered material evidences exercise; the option is treated as unexercised
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
854,160
Expected
854,160
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (GPR 864,000; 6.00% combined revenue loss; other income 42,000 added after loss)
Calculation supplied
864,000 x (1 - 0.06) + 42,000 = 812,160 + 42,000 = 854,160
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
30,000
Expected
30,000
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (greater of T12 actual and 3.00% of underwritten EGI) · T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (T12 management fee 30,000)
Calculation supplied
max(30,000; 0.03 x 854,160 = 25,624.80) = 30,000
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
308,200
Expected
308,200
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 expense treatment table
Calculation supplied
112,000 taxes + 33,600 insurance + 28,800 utilities + 40,200 R&M (46,200 - 6,000 one-time casualty) + 42,000 payroll + 21,600 admin + 30,000 management = 308,200
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
545,960
Expected
545,960
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 · Workbook Underwriting!B17
Calculation supplied
854,160 - 308,200 = 545,960
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
10,800
Expected
10,800
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 ($300.00 per unit per year, deducted after NOI) · Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7-42 (36 units)
Calculation supplied
36 units x 300 = 10,800
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
535,160
Expected
535,160
Response evidence
Workbook Underwriting!B19
Calculation supplied
545,960 - 10,800 = 535,160
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
9,494,956.52
Expected
9,494,956.521739
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (underwritten NOI BEFORE reserves divided by 5.75% cap rate; no appraisal implied)
Calculation supplied
545,960 / 0.0575 = 9,494,956.52
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.059
Expected
0.059
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Contract rate 5.90% fixed annual contractual rate'
Calculation supplied
Stated
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0625
Expected
0.0625
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Sizing rate: greater of current contractual rate and 6.25% underwriting floor'
Calculation supplied
max(5.90%, 6.25%) = 6.25%
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.073886
Expected
0.073886
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (30-year amortization, monthly payments; annual debt service = 12 monthly payments) · Workbook Sizing!B7
Calculation supplied
12 x PMT(0.0625/12, 360, 1) = 12 x 0.006157172 = 0.07388606405
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,171,721.74
Expected
6,171,721.73913
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (LTV 65.00% of indicative value) · Workbook Sizing!B10
Calculation supplied
0.65 x 9,494,956.52 = 6,171,721.74
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
5,794,435.06
Expected
5,794,435.060223
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (minimum 1.25x using NCF after reserves over annual amortizing debt service at sizing rate) · Workbook Sizing!B11
Calculation supplied
(535,160 / 1.25) / 0.07388606405 = 428,128 / 0.07388606405 = 5,794,435.06
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
6,296,000
Expected
6,296,000
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (minimum 8.50%; numerator is underwritten NCF AFTER reserves) · Workbook Sizing!B12
Calculation supplied
535,160 / 0.085 = 6,296,000
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
5,794,435.06
Expected
5,794,435.060223
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (loan ceiling is the lowest of the three constraints; no separate dollar cap) · Workbook Sizing!B14
Calculation supplied
min(6,171,721.74; 5,794,435.06; 6,296,000) = 5,794,435.06
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Workbook Sizing!B15
Calculation supplied
The DSCR constraint is the lowest of the three
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
428,128
Expected
428,128
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 · Workbook Sizing!B17
Calculation supplied
5,794,435.06 x 0.07388606405 = 428,128.00
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.25
Expected
1.25
Response evidence
Workbook Sizing!B18
Calculation supplied
535,160 / 428,128 = 1.250 (binding exactly at the minimum)
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.0924
Expected
0.092358
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (debt-yield numerator is NCF after reserves) · Workbook Sizing!B19
Calculation supplied
535,160 / 5,794,435.06 = 0.092358
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
341,871.67
Expected
341,871.668553
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (interest-only period 24 months; contract rate 5.90%) · Workbook Sizing!B21
Calculation supplied
Year 1 is interest-only: 5,794,435.06 x 0.059 = 341,871.67
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
2,405,976.8
Expected
2,405,976.797272
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (existing debt payoff $3,300,000; fixed closing costs $45,000) · Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (origination fee 0.75% of actual initial principal) · Workbook SourcesUses!B12
Calculation supplied
5,794,435.06 - 3,300,000 - (0.0075 x 5,794,435.06 = 43,458.26) - 45,000 = 2,405,976.80 (positive = cash out)
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
503,252
Expected
503,252
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 sensitivity instruction · Workbook Sensitivity!B11
Calculation supplied
EGI 854,160 x 0.95 = 811,452; management = max(30,000; 0.03 x 811,452 = 24,343.56) = 30,000 so total opex stays 308,200; NOI = 811,452 - 308,200 = 503,252
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
4,812,558.61
Expected
4,812,558.614707
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (combined downside: EGI -5% and sizing rate +100 bps; cap rate constant) · Workbook Sensitivity!C18
Calculation supplied
Stressed NCF = 503,252 - 10,800 = 492,452. Sizing rate 7.25%, annual constant 0.08186115. LTV = 0.65 x (503,252/0.0575) = 5,688,935.65; DSCR = (492,452/1.25)/0.08186115 = 4,812,558.61; debt yield = 492,452/0.085 = 5,793,552.94; minimum = 4,812,558.61 (DSCR-bound)

GPT-5 agent · direct API control

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
36
Expected
36
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll C7:C42 (units 101–136)
Calculation supplied
Count of listed units 101–136 = 36
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
33
Expected
33
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll F7:F42 (Status); Vacant at 109, 125, 136
Calculation supplied
36 total - 3 vacant = 33 occupied
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
31,800
Expected
31,800
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll E7:E42 (Area SF)
Calculation supplied
20 units × 750 sf + 16 units × 1,050 sf = 15,000 + 16,800 = 31,800 sf
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
28,950
Expected
28,950
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll rows with Status='Occupied'
Calculation supplied
Occupied: 19 units × 750 sf + 14 units × 1,050 sf = 14,250 + 14,700 = 28,950 sf
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
91.67
Expected
91.666667
Response evidence
Derived from space_count and occupied_count
Calculation supplied
33 / 36 = 0.9167 → 91.67%
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
91.04
Expected
91.037736
Response evidence
Derived from total_area_sf and occupied_area_sf
Calculation supplied
28,950 / 31,800 = 0.9104 → 91.04%
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
62,275
Expected
62,275
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll G7:G42; blanks for vacant (C45 note)
Calculation supplied
750-sf occupied: 19 × $1,675 = $31,825; 1,050-sf occupied: 14 × $2,175 = $30,450; total = $62,275
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
62,275
Expected
62,275
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §3 (Unit 101 $1,675/mo; no increases before 2027-09-01). No other signed amendments supplied.
Calculation supplied
No authoritative amendments provided aside from unit 101 confirming $1,675; therefore effective equals printed rent roll for all units = $62,275
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
821,100
Expected
821,100
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (Annual totals)
Calculation supplied
Gross potential $840,000 - vacancy $42,000 - concessions $12,000 - bad debt $4,500 + other income $39,600 = $821,100
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
307,800
Expected
307,800
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (Annual totals)
Calculation supplied
Taxes 108,000 + Insurance 31,200 + Utilities 28,800 + R&M 46,200 + Payroll 42,000 + Admin 21,600 + Mgmt 30,000 = $307,800
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
513,300
Expected
513,300
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
EGI $821,100 - OpEx $307,800 = $513,300
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
10,800
Expected
10,800
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2 (Replacement reserves annual total)
Calculation supplied
Sum of monthly replacement reserves = $10,800
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
502,500
Expected
502,500
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
NOI before reserves $513,300 - reserves $10,800 = $502,500
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,675
Expected
1,675
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §3; Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll G7 (unit 101)
Calculation supplied
As stated in executed lease extract; matches rent roll
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2027-07-31
Expected
2027-07-31
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §2; Rent-Roll.xlsx!Rent Roll I7
Calculation supplied
As stated; no renewal exercise delivered
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,675
Expected
1,675
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §4
Calculation supplied
As stated
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 §5 (No exercise notice included; do not extend expiry based on option alone)
Calculation supplied
No evidence of exercise in packet
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
854,160
Expected
854,160
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Underwriting plan)
Calculation supplied
GPBR $864,000 - 6.0% loss $51,840 + other income $42,000 = $854,160
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
30,000
Expected
30,000
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Management fee rule and T12 actual $30,000)
Calculation supplied
Greater of T12 actual $30,000 and 3% of EGI (3% × $854,160 = $25,624.80) → $30,000
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
308,200
Expected
308,200
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (category-by-category instructions)
Calculation supplied
Taxes 112,000 + Insurance 33,600 + Utilities 28,800 + R&M (46,200 - 6,000 one-time) 40,200 + Payroll 42,000 + Admin 21,600 + Mgmt 30,000 = $308,200
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
545,960
Expected
545,960
Response evidence
Derived from Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
EGI $854,160 - OpEx $308,200 = $545,960
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
10,800
Expected
10,800
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Replacement reserves $300/unit/year); Rent-Roll.xlsx (36 units)
Calculation supplied
36 units × $300 = $10,800
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
535,160
Expected
535,160
Response evidence
Derived from underwriting above
Calculation supplied
NOI before reserves $545,960 - reserves $10,800 = $535,160
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
9,494,956.52
Expected
9,494,956.521739
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Value = UW NOI before reserves / 5.75% cap)
Calculation supplied
$545,960 / 0.0575 = $9,494,956.52
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.059
Expected
0.059
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Contract rate 5.90% fixed)
Calculation supplied
As stated
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0625
Expected
0.0625
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Greater of contract 5.90% and 6.25% floor → 6.25%)
Calculation supplied
max(0.0590, 0.0625) = 0.0625
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.073908
Expected
0.073886
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (30-year, monthly payments; sizing rate 6.25%)
Calculation supplied
12 × [r_m / (1 - (1 + r_m)^-360)], r_m = 0.0625/12 = 0.0052083333 → annual constant ≈ 0.073908
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,171,721.74
Expected
6,171,721.73913
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (LTV 65%; valuation NOI/5.75%)
Calculation supplied
65% × $9,494,956.52 = $6,171,721.74
dscr_limitValue failed
Reported
5,792,651
Expected
5,794,435.060223
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (DSCR ≥1.25 with NCF/annual amortizing debt service at sizing rate)
Calculation supplied
Allowable DS = $535,160 / 1.25 = $428,128; Loan = $428,128 / 0.073908 ≈ $5,792,651
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
6,296,000
Expected
6,296,000
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Debt yield ≥8.50%; numerator UW NCF after reserves)
Calculation supplied
$535,160 / 0.085 = $6,296,000
maximum_loanValue failed
Reported
5,792,651
Expected
5,794,435.060223
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Loan ceiling is lowest of three constraints)
Calculation supplied
min(LTV $6.172M, DSCR $5.793M, Debt Yield $6.296M) = $5.793M (DSCR)
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
See constraint calculations above
Calculation supplied
DSCR limit is the smallest
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
428,128
Expected
428,128
Response evidence
Derived from maximum_loan and annual_debt_constant
Calculation supplied
$5,792,651 × 0.073908 ≈ $428,128
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.25
Expected
1.25
Response evidence
Lender DSCR convention
Calculation supplied
$535,160 / $428,128 = 1.25x
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.0924
Expected
0.092358
Response evidence
Lender debt yield convention (UW NCF / Loan)
Calculation supplied
$535,160 ÷ $5,792,651 ≈ 0.0924 (9.24%)
first_year_debt_serviceValue failed
Reported
341,766.41
Expected
341,871.668553
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (24 months interest-only; contract rate 5.90%)
Calculation supplied
Year 1 IO interest = $5,792,651 × 0.0590 = $341,766.41
cash_to_borrowerValue failed
Reported
2,404,206.12
Expected
2,405,976.797272
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (Existing payoff $3,300,000; Fixed closing costs $45,000); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (Origination fee 0.75%)
Calculation supplied
$5,792,651 - $3,300,000 - (0.75% × $5,792,651 = $43,444.88) - $45,000 = $2,404,206.12
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
503,252
Expected
503,252
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Sensitivity instruction)
Calculation supplied
Stress EGI = $854,160 × 95% = $811,452; Mgmt = max($30,000, 3% × $811,452 = $24,343.56) → $30,000; Other OpEx unchanged ($278,200 excl. mgmt). Stress OpEx = $308,200. Stress NOI (before reserves) = $811,452 - $308,200 = $503,252
stress_maximum_loanValue failed
Reported
4,810,354
Expected
4,812,558.614707
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (Sensitivity instruction: EGI -5%, sizing rate +100 bps, cap rate unchanged); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1
Calculation supplied
Stress NCF = ($503,252 - $10,800) = $492,452; Sizing rate = 7.25% (floor +100 bps); 30-yr annual constant ≈ 0.08190; DSCR-limit loan = ($492,452 / 1.25) / 0.08190 ≈ $4,810,354. LTV-limit (65% × [$503,252/0.0575]) ≈ $5,688,936; Debt-yield limit ($492,452/0.085) ≈ $5,793,553. Minimum = DSCR ≈ $4.81M

Opus 5 agent · direct API control

space_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
36
Expected
36
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx, worksheet 'Rent Roll', rows 7-42 (units 101-136)
Calculation supplied
Count of unit rows 7 through 42 = 36 units (20 units at 750 SF = 101-120; 16 units at 1,050 SF = 121-136)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_countValue passedSource supported
Reported
33
Expected
33
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7-42, column F 'Status'; vacant rows: 15 (unit 109), 31 (unit 125), 42 (unit 136)
Calculation supplied
36 total - 3 rows marked 'Vacant' = 33 occupied
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
total_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
31,800
Expected
31,800
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column E, rows 7-42
Calculation supplied
(20 x 750) + (16 x 1,050) = 15,000 + 16,800 = 31,800 SF
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupied_area_sfValue passedSource supported
Reported
28,950
Expected
28,950
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column E/F, rows 7-42; vacant rows 15 (750 SF), 31 (1,050 SF), 42 (1,050 SF)
Calculation supplied
31,800 - (750 + 1,050 + 1,050 = 2,850 vacant SF) = 28,950 SF
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_count_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
91.6667
Expected
91.666667
Response evidence
Derived from Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7-42
Calculation supplied
33 / 36 x 100 = 91.66667%
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
occupancy_area_pctValue passedSource supported
Reported
91.0377
Expected
91.037736
Response evidence
Derived from Rent-Roll.xlsx column E/F
Calculation supplied
28,950 / 31,800 x 100 = 91.03774%
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
rent_roll_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
62,275
Expected
62,275
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column G, rows 7-42 (as printed; blank for vacant rows 15, 31, 42)
Calculation supplied
19 occupied 750-SF units x $1,675 = $31,825; 14 occupied 1,050-SF units x $2,175 = $30,450; total = $62,275/month
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx / Rent Roll rows 7 onward
effective_monthly_baseValue passedSource supported
Reported
62,275
Expected
62,275
Response evidence
Rent-Roll.xlsx column G; Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.3 (unit 101 base rent $1,675/month as of 2026-08-31); Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.6 (amendment authority)
Calculation supplied
No executed amendment is included in the packet. The only lease-level evidence (unit 101) states $1,675/month as of 2026-08-31, which equals the rent-roll figure, so no adjustment: $62,275/month. Annualized contractual base = $747,300 (context only, not underwritten).
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Rent-Roll.xlsx and Lease-File.pdf / executed amendment where present
t12_egiValue passedSource supported
Reported
821,100
Expected
821,100
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, 'Annual' column: GPR 840,000; vacancy (42,000); concessions (12,000); bad debt (4,500); other income 39,600
Calculation supplied
840,000 - 42,000 - 12,000 - 4,500 + 39,600 = 821,100
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_operating_expensesValue passedSource supported
Reported
307,800
Expected
307,800
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, 'Annual' column expense rows (taxes 108,000; insurance 31,200; utilities 28,800; R&M 46,200; payroll 42,000; admin/legal 21,600; management 30,000)
Calculation supplied
108,000 + 31,200 + 28,800 + 46,200 + 42,000 + 21,600 + 30,000 = 307,800. Excludes reserves 10,800, capital improvements 62,000, loan P&I 294,000 and depreciation 180,000 per p.1/p.2 footnote and Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_noi_before_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
513,300
Expected
513,300
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2 annual column
Calculation supplied
821,100 EGI - 307,800 operating expenses = 513,300
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_reservesValue passedSource supported
Reported
10,800
Expected
10,800
Response evidence
T12-Statement.pdf p.2, 'Replacement reserves (below NOI)' annual = 10,800
Calculation supplied
Reported annual line, taken as printed (monthly rows sum to 10,800)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
t12_ncfValue passedSource supported
Reported
502,500
Expected
502,500
Response evidence
Derived from T12-Statement.pdf p.2; label caution per Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1
Calculation supplied
513,300 - 10,800 = 502,500. Note: the accounting package's 'property NOI' may refer to this after-reserve figure; both are reported separately here.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
T12-Statement.pdf / annual column, page 2
subject_lease_monthly_rentValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,675
Expected
1,675
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.3 ('Base rent is $1,675 per month as of August 31, 2026'); corroborated by Rent-Roll.xlsx G7
Calculation supplied
Authoritative executed lease equals rent roll; no amendment supplied. No base-rent increase before 2027-09-01 (Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.3).
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_expiryValue passedSource supported
Reported
2027-07-31
Expected
2027-07-31
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.2 ('initial term expires 2027-07-31'); Rent-Roll.xlsx I7
Calculation supplied
Initial term expiry taken as authoritative; renewal option NOT applied because no exercise notice, acknowledgment or amendment is in the packet (Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.5)
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
subject_lease_depositValue passedSource supported
Reported
1,675
Expected
1,675
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.4 ('The security deposit is $1,675 and is not prepaid rent or recurring income')
Calculation supplied
Stated; excluded from income in all EGI/NOI figures
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
renewal_option_exercisedValue passedSource supported
Reported
Not evidenced
Expected
Not evidenced
Response evidence
Lease-File.pdf p.1 s.5 ('No exercise notice, landlord acknowledgment or amendment exercising this option is included in the packet. Do not extend the current expiry based on the existence of the option alone'); Rent-Roll.xlsx C47
Calculation supplied
No exercise evidence delivered; option exists but is unexercised in the record. Notice deadline is at least 180 days before 2027-07-31 (i.e., on/before approx. 2027-02-01), which had not passed as of the 2026-08-31 as-of date.
Review
The cited original source location, including explicitly linked calculations and scoped table context, supports the reported value.
Checked source
Lease-File.pdf / clauses 2-5, including executed amendment where present
uw_egiValue passed
Reported
854,160
Expected
854,160
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2: GPR $864,000; combined revenue loss 6.00% of underwritten GPR; other income $42,000 added after revenue loss
Calculation supplied
864,000 x (1 - 0.06) = 812,160; 812,160 + 42,000 = 854,160
uw_management_feeValue passed
Reported
30,000
Expected
30,000
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2, 'Management fee: Greater of T12 actual and 3.00% of underwritten EGI'; T12-Statement.pdf p.2 management fee annual 30,000
Calculation supplied
3.00% x 854,160 = 25,624.80; max(30,000; 25,624.80) = 30,000 (T12 actual floor binds)
uw_operating_expensesValue passed
Reported
308,200
Expected
308,200
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 category table (taxes 112,000; insurance 33,600; utilities T12 28,800; R&M T12 less $6,000 one-time casualty; payroll T12 42,000; admin T12 21,600; management per formula)
Calculation supplied
112,000 + 33,600 + 28,800 + (46,200 - 6,000 = 40,200) + 42,000 + 21,600 + 30,000 = 308,200 (before reserves)
uw_noi_before_reservesValue passed
Reported
545,960
Expected
545,960
Response evidence
Derived from Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
854,160 - 308,200 = 545,960
uw_reservesValue passed
Reported
10,800
Expected
10,800
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 ('$300.00 per unit per year; deduct after NOI'); unit count from Rent-Roll.xlsx rows 7-42
Calculation supplied
36 units x $300 = 10,800
uw_ncfValue passed
Reported
535,160
Expected
535,160
Response evidence
Derived from Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2
Calculation supplied
545,960 - 10,800 = 535,160
capitalization_valueValue passed
Reported
9,494,086.96
Expected
9,494,956.521739
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Valuation: Underwritten NOI BEFORE reserves / 5.75% cap rate; no appraisal is implied'
Calculation supplied
545,960 / 0.0575 = 9,494,086.9565 (indicative only; no appraisal supplied)
contract_rateValue passed
Reported
0.059
Expected
0.059
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Contract rate 5.90% fixed annual contractual rate'
Calculation supplied
Stated
sizing_rateValue passed
Reported
0.0625
Expected
0.0625
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Sizing rate: Greater of current contractual rate and 6.25% underwriting floor'
Calculation supplied
max(0.0590; 0.0625) = 0.0625 (floor binds)
annual_debt_constantValue passed
Reported
0.073886
Expected
0.073886
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (30-year amortization, monthly payments, annual DS = 12 monthly payments; sizing rate 6.25%)
Calculation supplied
i = 0.0625/12 = 0.00520833; n = 360; monthly factor = i / (1 - (1+i)^-360) = 0.00615717; annual constant = 12 x 0.00615717 = 0.07388606
ltv_limitValue passed
Reported
6,171,156.52
Expected
6,171,721.73913
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'LTV 65.00% of indicative value'
Calculation supplied
0.65 x 9,494,086.9565 = 6,171,156.52
dscr_limitValue passed
Reported
5,794,436
Expected
5,794,435.060223
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'DSCR minimum 1.25x using NCF AFTER reserves / annual amortizing debt service at sizing rate'
Calculation supplied
535,160 / (1.25 x 0.07388606) = 535,160 / 0.09235757 = 5,794,435.65
debt_yield_limitValue passed
Reported
6,296,000
Expected
6,296,000
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Debt yield minimum 8.50%; numerator is underwritten NCF AFTER reserves'
Calculation supplied
535,160 / 0.085 = 6,296,000.00 (exact)
maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
5,794,436
Expected
5,794,435.060223
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Loan ceiling: Lowest of the LTV, DSCR and debt-yield constraints; no separate dollar cap'
Calculation supplied
min(6,171,156.52 LTV; 5,794,435.65 DSCR; 6,296,000.00 debt yield) = 5,794,435.65
binding_constraintValue passed
Reported
DSCR
Expected
DSCR
Response evidence
Comparison of the three constraints above (Lender-Terms.pdf p.1)
Calculation supplied
DSCR limit is the lowest; it is ~$376,721 below the LTV limit and ~$501,564 below the debt-yield limit
sizing_annual_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
428,128
Expected
428,128
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (amortizing DS at sizing rate, 12 monthly payments)
Calculation supplied
5,794,435.65 x 0.07388606 = 428,128.00 (equivalently 535,160 / 1.25); monthly payment approx. 35,677.33
sizing_dscrValue passed
Reported
1.25
Expected
1.25
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 DSCR definition (NCF after reserves / amortizing DS at sizing rate)
Calculation supplied
535,160 / 428,128 = 1.2500 (at the 1.25x minimum, as expected where DSCR binds)
sizing_debt_yieldValue passed
Reported
0.092358
Expected
0.092358
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 debt-yield definition (numerator = underwritten NCF after reserves)
Calculation supplied
535,160 / 5,794,435.65 = 0.0923576 (9.236%), vs 8.50% minimum - passes with 73.8 bps cushion
first_year_debt_serviceValue passed
Reported
341,871.7
Expected
341,871.668553
Response evidence
Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 'Interest-only period 24 months' and 'Contract rate 5.90%' (IO covers all of year 1)
Calculation supplied
5,794,435.65 x 0.059 = 341,871.70 (monthly interest-only approx. 28,489.31). Sizing DS of 428,128 at 6.25% amortizing is $86,256 higher; year-1 coverage on actual IO DS = 535,160 / 341,871.70 = 1.565x (illustrative; not the lender test).
cash_to_borrowerValue passed
Reported
2,405,977.38
Expected
2,405,976.797272
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.1 (existing debt payoff $3,300,000; fixed closing costs $45,000); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 (origination fee 0.75% of actual initial principal; no fee capitalization/interest reserve/holdback)
Calculation supplied
5,794,435.65 - 3,300,000 - (0.0075 x 5,794,435.65 = 43,458.27) - 45,000 = 2,405,977.38 (positive = cash out to borrower)
stress_uw_noiValue passed
Reported
503,252
Expected
503,252
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 sensitivity instruction (reduce total underwritten EGI by 5%, recompute management minimum, hold all other expense/reserve assumptions constant)
Calculation supplied
Stress EGI = 854,160 x 0.95 = 811,452; management = max(30,000; 3% x 811,452 = 24,343.56) = 30,000 (unchanged); opex = 308,200; stress NOI before reserves = 811,452 - 308,200 = 503,252; stress NCF = 503,252 - 10,800 = 492,452
stress_maximum_loanValue passed
Reported
4,812,558
Expected
4,812,558.614707
Response evidence
Property-and-Plan.pdf p.2 (combined downside: EGI -5% AND sizing rate +100 bps; cap rate unchanged at 5.75%); Lender-Terms.pdf p.1 constraint definitions
Calculation supplied
Stress sizing rate = 7.25%; i = 0.00604167, monthly factor = 0.00682176, annual constant = 0.08186117. LTV: (503,252 / 0.0575) x 0.65 = 8,752,208.70 x 0.65 = 5,688,935.65. DSCR: 492,452 / (1.25 x 0.08186117) = 492,452 / 0.10232646 = 4,812,557.8. Debt yield: 492,452 / 0.085 = 5,793,552.94. Minimum = 4,812,558 (DSCR binding); stress amortizing DS = 492,452 / 1.25 = 393,961.60. Reduction vs base max loan = 981,878 (-16.9%).

Back to the complete comparison